donate

The Martlet

Canadian forces and protesters find peace

Feb 25, 2009 | Volume 61 Issue 24 | 6 Comments
Share |

It had all the hallmarks out of an old 1970’s dystopian film: protestors holding banners, crowds of arguing passersby and the presence of members of the armed forces providing information on a university campus. But this situation had a twist — the armed forces weren’t as annoyed or rude as their stereotype suggested.

The protest happened in the Student Union Building during the February Career Fair, but while the event has long past, the fact remains that strong statements can be made peacefully.

“Find your fit” was the slogan of the fair, yet the military protest consisted of five students carrying a red banner and red dye on their hands, handing out leaflets in front of the Canadian Forces information booth where a chief petty officer second class and an Air Force captain were patiently answering questions from students.

“What better place to show a balance of opinions but here?” asked Shannon Lucy from Students for a Democratic Society. “We’re here to protest the military presence on campus ... because lots of students feel that during a recession joining the Canadian Forces is an option — it’s called the poverty draft.”

Lucy’s most poignant question was aimed at Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s government: why is Canada spending money on the war in Afghanistan when it can help support people at home?

Captain Bill Michael, the Detachment Commanding Officer for the Canadian Forces Recruitment Centre, was watching the protesters calmly when asked about his feelings concerning their presence.

“I think it is great for a student population to stand for what they believe in,” he said. “Most students are characterized as being terribly apathetic, but these people have the conviction to stand and protest. It is great that we live in a country were people not only can voice their opposition to something but do, and do it publicly.”

The protest continued until the end of the day. Campus Security stayed close to monitor if things were going all right. They were, and there were no incidents — just lively debate between the protesters and students visiting the booths.

I had the interesting experience of debating with the protesters on the merits of a completely pacifist society in the face of a globe that doesn’t always operate that way, and of the legitimacy of government. Though no victory was achieved by either side, no converts to either opinion, I agree with Michael that it speaks to the condition of civil liberties in this country when there are completely peaceful protests to stark opposing view points.

Share |

6 Comments

The Martlet has an open comments policy and will endeavour to promote healthy discussion. We strive to act as an agent of constructive social change and will remove racist, sexist, homophobic, or otherwise oppressive comments.

Leave a Comment

  • Aaron Feb. 26, 2009, 1:47 p.m.

    Interesting article. I find it funny Captain Bill Michael was implying how wonderful it is these students are protesting the very entity that has ensured that they have the right to protest in public.

    I was one of the students harassed by the protesters when I approached the CF table. It was suggested by the protesters I didn't have ALL the information about war. I've been a war nut and current events fanatic for years. I'd rather read BBC or CBC than to read their biased facts.

    I was asked So you are alright with killing people? The answer is yes, sometimes people have to die.

    And that's where our core beliefs diverge. There is no discussion point between us if we can't agree on the basis of the military: to defend our freedom with force if necessary.

  • Aaron Feb. 26, 2009, 1:47 p.m.

    Interesting article. I find it funny Captain Bill Michael was implying how wonderful it is these students are protesting the very entity that has ensured that they have the right to protest in public.

    I was one of the students harassed by the protesters when I approached the CF table. It was suggested by the protesters I didn't have ALL the information about war. I've been a war nut and current events fanatic for years. I'd rather read BBC or CBC than to read their biased facts.

    I was asked So you are alright with killing people? The answer is yes, sometimes people have to die.

    And that's where our core beliefs diverge. There is no discussion point between us if we can't agree on the basis of the military: to defend our freedom with force if necessary.

  • Kelsey Hannan Feb. 27, 2009, 4:27 a.m.

    I always found it amazing that people who have their rights so close to being violated (protestors provoking law enforcement by blocking military recruitment tables) argue for military recruiters to be banned on campus. If anything, these protestors should recognize that honouring democratic principles of choice and freedom are essential to why they have a voice of protest in the first place.

    Your article was a refreshing reminder to us all that strongly conflicting points of view can collide peacefully in public as long as all involved are committed to democratic values.

  • Kelsey Hannan Feb. 27, 2009, 4:27 a.m.

    I always found it amazing that people who have their rights so close to being violated (protestors provoking law enforcement by blocking military recruitment tables) argue for military recruiters to be banned on campus. If anything, these protestors should recognize that honouring democratic principles of choice and freedom are essential to why they have a voice of protest in the first place.

    Your article was a refreshing reminder to us all that strongly conflicting points of view can collide peacefully in public as long as all involved are committed to democratic values.

  • Pierre Elliot May 24, 2010, 5:31 p.m.

    Democratic principles of choice and freedom.

    For many people in poverty, their only choice is to join the military. You invoke a 'choice' which, in reality, is many times the illusion of choice, or forced choice. Many working class and poor have no other option than to join the military, with is rampant internal sexism and racism.

    I speak from personal experience. Taking poor teens and turning them into misogynistic, racist killers in order to protect the 'choice' of others to do the same?

    That is not Democratic, Kelsey Hannan. You reek of privilege.

  • Pierre Elliot May 24, 2010, 5:31 p.m.

    Democratic principles of choice and freedom.

    For many people in poverty, their only choice is to join the military. You invoke a 'choice' which, in reality, is many times the illusion of choice, or forced choice. Many working class and poor have no other option than to join the military, with is rampant internal sexism and racism.

    I speak from personal experience. Taking poor teens and turning them into misogynistic, racist killers in order to protect the 'choice' of others to do the same?

    That is not Democratic, Kelsey Hannan. You reek of privilege.

 

Martlet Video

Fight the Pipe

The Martlet on Twitter

  • Feb. 8, 2012, 9:54 p.m. Our sex themed issue comes out tomorrow. You guys should be excited.
Join our mailing list