donate

The Martlet

Donors undermine progress

Jan 06, 2010 | Volume 62 Issue 17 | 6 Comments
Share |

In Copenhagen, Canada earned a reputation as the “fossil of the day” in climate change. Our inability to meet the conditions of the Kyoto Accords has earned us global scorn.

One only needs to look at B.C.’s political landscape to get an idea of how Canada got to this point. Just examine the B.C. Liberals’ contributors list and you begin to see the problem.

In last year’s election, Canadian Natural Resources Limited, an Albertan oil and gas exploration and development company, donated $7,000 to the Liberals. Terasen Gas doubled that with a $15,000 donation. Another large contributor was Teck Cominco. This mining company donated $75,000 to the Liberals. In the past two years, Teck has been involved in two major court cases for illegally dumping waste into rivers.

In one case, they had to construct a $120 million wastewater pipeline to settle a lawsuit filed by the Inupiat Eskimos, whose drinking water had been fouled by dumping. In another, they were forced to pay a Native band in Washington $1 million for dumping into the Columbia River. That dumping occurred in B.C. under the Liberal government in March 2009.

On Sept. 22, 2009 the NDP reported that the Liberals made a renewed push to lift the ban on coastal drilling, despite Campbell’s government saying in April that they would be addressing climate change and creating jobs in the “green” economy. This story received limited attention from the public, who were distracted by the potential Harmonized Sales Tax (HST). Granted, these serious issues are not directly related to those discussed in Copenhagen, which focused on reducing carbon emissions. Thankfully, the Liberals don’t have any well-funded special interest groups to protect in that area. Oh wait. The largest contributor the Liberals in 2009 was The New Car Dealership Association of B.C. This association represents hundreds of new car dealerships across the province and gave an astounding $229,700 to the Liberals. The association made sure to cover their bases though, as they were also the NDP’s largest non-union contributor.

What does this mean for the future of green initiatives in B.C.? Considering the strength of the Liberal Party, and the financing of the party, it will be difficult for them to lose power.

Maybe we should take a closer look at the message in Copenhagen. It’s time to stop protesting HST and start protesting against offshore drilling and waste dumping. It’s time to demand better public transit to offset driving. It’s time to care more about the health of our country and planet.

Share |

6 Comments

The Martlet has an open comments policy and will endeavour to promote healthy discussion. We strive to act as an agent of constructive social change and will remove racist, sexist, homophobic, or otherwise oppressive comments.

Leave a Comment

  • Bahram Farzady Jan. 12, 2010, 12:28 a.m.

    Here, here!

  • Bahram Farzady Jan. 12, 2010, 12:28 a.m.

    Here, here!

  • John Redynolds Jan. 16, 2010, 10:53 p.m.

    And how about a carbon tax on each tonne of coal BC exports? (and not just the small amount of fuel the mines burn to mine it all)

    Coal should not be allowed to leave BC without a sufficient carbon tax paid!

  • John Redynolds Jan. 16, 2010, 10:53 p.m.

    And how about a carbon tax on each tonne of coal BC exports? (and not just the small amount of fuel the mines burn to mine it all)

    Coal should not be allowed to leave BC without a sufficient carbon tax paid!

  • Tom Jan. 20, 2010, 6:17 a.m.

    The big flaw with this article is that Provincial political parties had nothing to do with Copenhagen. I would have expected the Martlet to at least know the difference between Provincial and Federal politics.

    A much more relevant article would be looking at who is contributing to the Conservative Party of Canada seeing as it was Stephen Harper and delegates who actually represented Canada in Copenhagen.

  • Tom Jan. 20, 2010, 6:17 a.m.

    The big flaw with this article is that Provincial political parties had nothing to do with Copenhagen. I would have expected the Martlet to at least know the difference between Provincial and Federal politics.

    A much more relevant article would be looking at who is contributing to the Conservative Party of Canada seeing as it was Stephen Harper and delegates who actually represented Canada in Copenhagen.

 

Martlet Video

Fight the Pipe

The Martlet on Twitter

  • Feb. 8, 2012, 9:54 p.m. Our sex themed issue comes out tomorrow. You guys should be excited.
Join our mailing list