Rabbit cull miffs UVic community members
Traps such as the one above are being used in the university's cull of rabbits around athletic fields.
Some campus community members feel the university hasn’t exhausted all the options for controlling UVic’s rabbit population, but their voices aren’t being heard.
The university began culling its rabbit population, which is estimated between 1,500 and 1,600 rabbits, on May 8. So far, more than 100 rabbits have been culled.
Susan Vickery of Common Ground, which led a pilot project to sterilize rabbits around the athletic field last year, said the university administration pulled the plug on the project before it was complete.
“We got a lot of [community] support,” she said. “I was actually in shock when they pulled it.”
Vickery said the pilot project was really a feasibility study. The plan was to trap, spay or neuter, and then rehouse rabbits, as well as track the population. The pilot project was expected to target approximately 150 rabbits, although the number was closer to 200 after the spring population increase.
“We were gathering a lot of info that we didn’t previously have.”
The pilot project was cut short, about 50 rabbits in, when an issue arose with the Ministry of Environment. The rabbits were to be taken to sanctuaries, but in order to do so, special permits were required.
“There was no place to take the rabbits,” said Tom Smith, UVic’s executive director of Facilities Management. “The sanctuaries that were hoping to take them were unwilling to go through the licensing process.”
He added that 40 of the spayed and neutered rabbits were returned to campus.
However, Vickery said Common Ground was still working with the sanctuaries and negotiating with the ministry when the pilot project was ended.
“I knew we were going to be able to see the other side of [the permitting issue]. UVic could have got allowances,” she said. “We ran into a minor obstacle with the ministry, but a major obstacle with the university administration, who didn’t want it to go through.”
Smith said the university began the cull because there are simply too many rabbits, and the university has a responsibility to control the population. Currently, they are focusing on the area around the athletic fields out of concern for the safety of athletes.
“Sometimes you see this tiny little hole, but the hole actually goes underground three or four feet and it goes parallel to the surface so when you walk along you step on the grass and it collapses under your feet,” said Smith. “So if you’re an athlete running and you do that, you could break your ankle or get seriously injured.”
Smith said the university also has a responsibility to keep the fields safe for members of the community who are using the fields on evenings and weekends. The university hopes to establish the athletic field area, as well as all other university property outside of Ring Road, as a rabbit-free zone. Inside Ring Road they plan to establish rabbit controlled zones.
However, many campus community members feel that culling the rabbit population outside of Ring Road isn’t the best option.
Vickery feels betrayed that the university didn’t see the pilot project through to the end.
“I don’t think they’ve even begun to look at the non-lethal approaches to managing that population problem,” she said. “I don’t think they’ve seriously engaged the community and all that support. I don’t think they’ve come halfway at all.”
Vickery isn’t alone. Facebook groups have sprung up opposing the cull, such as “Support Saving The UVic Bunnies,” which has 387 members, and “UVic Buns Management,” — a group dedicated to finding a non-lethal solution to rabbit overpopulation — which has 354 members. People opposed to the cull have also held marches and encouraged people to write to the university to try and get the attention of administrators.
Some rabbit activists have established chains of communication, and have come out to try and prevent rabbits from entering traps. One woman even offered to take a captured baby rabbit home with her.
The university is aware of the resistance to the cull.
“We respect that this is a sensitive issue for many people; many people care for the rabbits and we understand that,” said Smith. “This isn’t something that we want to do; this is something that we have to do.”
Smith said that while the university wants to be as respectful as possible of people’s opinions, it will be establishing its right to trap rabbits.
“These rabbits are considered wildlife under the Wildlife Act in B.C.,” he said. “The Wildlife Act states that its unlawful to interfere with legally set traps and there are fines that can be levied against people that interfere with legally set traps.”
Joey Fearon, a UVic Law student and representative of the UVic Vegan Association, says people need to take a step back and think about why the cull is happening.
“I think that generally speaking, when it comes to animals, most people are very confused, especially when it comes to how we should or shouldn’t treat animals.”
Fearon said that people often act in a contradictory fashion when it comes to animals — on one hand, treating them like family members and taking their welfare very seriously, and on the other, causing them extreme amounts of harm on a daily basis, such as through the meat industry or animal testing.
“I think from this framework where we claim to take animal interests seriously, but it’s very easy for us to be extremely violent to animals, I think that’s also at play in the situation with the UVic rabbits,” he said.
Fearon says that most people, when they see the rabbits, don’t want to harm them.
“[However], when they become an inconvenience, it becomes very easy to harm them,” he added. “If we claim to hold that we shouldn’t unnecessarily cause suffering and we shouldn’t unnecessarily kill animals, how does that play out with the UVic rabbits?”
Fearon said there are still many things the university could do, such as better fencing around the fields, to co-habit on campus with the rabbits.
“It doesn’t mean that the rabbits are never going to cause an inconvenience,” he said, “but that’s what it means to share the land with others. Humans cause us great inconvenience all the time.”


86 Comments
The Martlet has an open comments policy and will endeavour to promote healthy discussion. We strive to act as an agent of constructive social change and will remove racist, sexist, homophobic, or otherwise oppressive comments.
Leave a Comment
Sara June 12, 2010, 5:10 a.m.
If you're going to mention Facebook groups, why would you omit
Action for UVic Rabbitswith 1253 members. Way bigger than the other two.Sara June 12, 2010, 5:10 a.m.
If you're going to mention Facebook groups, why would you omit
Action for UVic Rabbitswith 1253 members. Way bigger than the other two.Bill June 12, 2010, 4:45 p.m.
Going to keep the rabbits inside the Ring Road. Great idea - NOT! What is to prevent them from crossing to the Dark Side? More fences around the Ring Road? Memos to all rabbits to
not Cross the Road? Why not think of the other options? UVic's reputation in this matter is on par with Campbell's HST! Methinks Mr Smith's real agenda is to kill off as many as they can, rabbit zones or not.Bill June 12, 2010, 4:45 p.m.
Going to keep the rabbits inside the Ring Road. Great idea - NOT! What is to prevent them from crossing to the Dark Side? More fences around the Ring Road? Memos to all rabbits to
not Cross the Road? Why not think of the other options? UVic's reputation in this matter is on par with Campbell's HST! Methinks Mr Smith's real agenda is to kill off as many as they can, rabbit zones or not.Charles June 12, 2010, 6:13 p.m.
Humane killing? How can anyone hold a strong, frightened rabbit long enough to inject a needle into the vein in its ear? What about the babies where the vein is hardly visible? Sorry I don't buy that method. Its too time consuming and too costly and truly what vet would want to euthanize a healthy creature? Aren't they supposed to provide health care, not kill? I hate to think of what other, crueler methods are being used.
Charles June 12, 2010, 6:13 p.m.
Humane killing? How can anyone hold a strong, frightened rabbit long enough to inject a needle into the vein in its ear? What about the babies where the vein is hardly visible? Sorry I don't buy that method. Its too time consuming and too costly and truly what vet would want to euthanize a healthy creature? Aren't they supposed to provide health care, not kill? I hate to think of what other, crueler methods are being used.
Joey June 12, 2010, 9:11 p.m.
“The sanctuaries that were hoping to take them were unwilling to go through the licensing process.” Correction.
Ten of the rabbits were relocated to EARS on Salt Spring Island. The registered animal welfare charity pursued the permitting process through the MOE and currently holds a 5-year permit for capturing, housing, sterilizing and providing life-long sanctuary care for UVic rabbits.
Joey June 12, 2010, 9:11 p.m.
“The sanctuaries that were hoping to take them were unwilling to go through the licensing process.” Correction.
Ten of the rabbits were relocated to EARS on Salt Spring Island. The registered animal welfare charity pursued the permitting process through the MOE and currently holds a 5-year permit for capturing, housing, sterilizing and providing life-long sanctuary care for UVic rabbits.
Jean June 12, 2010, 11:04 p.m.
Of the four (that I know of) Facebook groups opposing the ‘Convenience Kill’ the Martlet has chosen to mention not the largest group, “SAVE THE UVIC BUNNIES” with 1,408 members, or the second largest, “Action for UVic Rabbits” at 1,252 members - for a combined total of 2,660 people - but only the two smallest groups, with on the order of 350 members each.
Even more disturbing is the omission of any mention of Dr. Nick Shaw’s offer to vasectomise the male rabbits - at no cost to the University.
As the European Domestic rabbits that inhabit UVic are:
a) monogamous, and mate for life b) fiercely territorial. (Both buck and doe will violently repel a ‘strange’ rabbit - thus keeping fertile intruders out of the niche they occupy.)
Uvic’s rabbits also have a very short lifespan - so in any given period, a substantial number will die, and not be replaced.
The implications of these facts, with respect to the vasectomy program are: a)If the male of a pair is vasectomised, the pair will have no more offspring. b) The UVic rabbit population will implode.
Why has the Martlet misrepresented the extent of the opposition to the rabbit ‘Convenience Killing’?
Why has the Martlet omitted any mention of the most effective, humane and cost effective solution?
Why?
Jean June 12, 2010, 11:04 p.m.
Of the four (that I know of) Facebook groups opposing the ‘Convenience Kill’ the Martlet has chosen to mention not the largest group, “SAVE THE UVIC BUNNIES” with 1,408 members, or the second largest, “Action for UVic Rabbits” at 1,252 members - for a combined total of 2,660 people - but only the two smallest groups, with on the order of 350 members each.
Even more disturbing is the omission of any mention of Dr. Nick Shaw’s offer to vasectomise the male rabbits - at no cost to the University.
As the European Domestic rabbits that inhabit UVic are:
a) monogamous, and mate for life b) fiercely territorial. (Both buck and doe will violently repel a ‘strange’ rabbit - thus keeping fertile intruders out of the niche they occupy.)
Uvic’s rabbits also have a very short lifespan - so in any given period, a substantial number will die, and not be replaced.
The implications of these facts, with respect to the vasectomy program are: a)If the male of a pair is vasectomised, the pair will have no more offspring. b) The UVic rabbit population will implode.
Why has the Martlet misrepresented the extent of the opposition to the rabbit ‘Convenience Killing’?
Why has the Martlet omitted any mention of the most effective, humane and cost effective solution?
Why?
Kelly June 13, 2010, 3:51 p.m.
The Min of Environment can relax the rules around the removal of rabbits from UVIC. Members of the public are looking for land and sanctuaries to remove the rabbits to. The cull is not an eventuality but a possibility. It's my hope that the university will entertain ideas put forth by serious animal welfare groups to remove the animals to safe areas where they can live out their lives in peace, altered so that they will not reproduce elsewhere. There are dedicated people who are willing to invest time and energy into such a project. Will UVIC listen to them?
Kelly June 13, 2010, 3:51 p.m.
The Min of Environment can relax the rules around the removal of rabbits from UVIC. Members of the public are looking for land and sanctuaries to remove the rabbits to. The cull is not an eventuality but a possibility. It's my hope that the university will entertain ideas put forth by serious animal welfare groups to remove the animals to safe areas where they can live out their lives in peace, altered so that they will not reproduce elsewhere. There are dedicated people who are willing to invest time and energy into such a project. Will UVIC listen to them?
Jeremy June 13, 2010, 7:27 p.m.
Kelly -
The cull is not an eventuality but a possibilityThe cull is happening right now! It is not an eventuality it is a reality. Traps have been set, poison has been placed, men armed with rifles have been shooting the rabbits at night.
Jeremy June 13, 2010, 7:27 p.m.
Kelly -
The cull is not an eventuality but a possibilityThe cull is happening right now! It is not an eventuality it is a reality. Traps have been set, poison has been placed, men armed with rifles have been shooting the rabbits at night.
Sue Milewski June 14, 2010, 12:29 p.m.
I am so ashamed of the UVic authorities! You want to kill helpless, homeless former pet rabbits. Have you no heart? Have you no decency? Look at the success that Long Beach and others have had with trapping and then spaying/neutering!! You are bringing shame to your University! Students and those off campus even share these sentiments. Change your heart and help these poor animals! The world is watching you and you are making fools of yourselves to the world by killing the rabbits! Animal lovers will no longer look favorably on your campus!
Sue Milewski June 14, 2010, 12:29 p.m.
I am so ashamed of the UVic authorities! You want to kill helpless, homeless former pet rabbits. Have you no heart? Have you no decency? Look at the success that Long Beach and others have had with trapping and then spaying/neutering!! You are bringing shame to your University! Students and those off campus even share these sentiments. Change your heart and help these poor animals! The world is watching you and you are making fools of yourselves to the world by killing the rabbits! Animal lovers will no longer look favorably on your campus!
Chuck June 14, 2010, 1:19 p.m.
We here in the USA have heard about the rabbit culling/killing and are very shocked that a public University would do such a thing, especially in light of all the public outrage. Many comments have been made about how this must be casting a negative light on the University and we wonder how it can afford to ignore the outcry? Universities here in America are thought of as parts of the communities they operate in and most listen to their city neighbors. Apparently UVic has no motive to listen to theirs. It is sad that the University refuses to find alternatives to killing these friendly little animals. If there are too many then find another humane way to deal with the problem rather than killing with poisons and clubs. Trapping is not the kind alternative UVic wants you to believe.
UVic.....Americans are watching and are appalled at your behavior!!
Chuck June 14, 2010, 1:19 p.m.
We here in the USA have heard about the rabbit culling/killing and are very shocked that a public University would do such a thing, especially in light of all the public outrage. Many comments have been made about how this must be casting a negative light on the University and we wonder how it can afford to ignore the outcry? Universities here in America are thought of as parts of the communities they operate in and most listen to their city neighbors. Apparently UVic has no motive to listen to theirs. It is sad that the University refuses to find alternatives to killing these friendly little animals. If there are too many then find another humane way to deal with the problem rather than killing with poisons and clubs. Trapping is not the kind alternative UVic wants you to believe.
UVic.....Americans are watching and are appalled at your behavior!!
Trevor June 14, 2010, 2:53 p.m.
How sad that I wrote a letter to ALL members of UVic's board of directors to strongly encourage them to stop the killing of all these innocent animals and to use the free and humane services of the vet who has so kindly offered to neuter them and got NO responses at all, not even from ONE member. It seems this board would rather kill innocent animals than do the right thing and let them live out their lives as nature intended them to and to have their population reduced slowly because they're unable to reproduce... this is a very dark day for UVic's administration and one I hope is not soon forgotten!
Trevor June 14, 2010, 2:53 p.m.
How sad that I wrote a letter to ALL members of UVic's board of directors to strongly encourage them to stop the killing of all these innocent animals and to use the free and humane services of the vet who has so kindly offered to neuter them and got NO responses at all, not even from ONE member. It seems this board would rather kill innocent animals than do the right thing and let them live out their lives as nature intended them to and to have their population reduced slowly because they're unable to reproduce... this is a very dark day for UVic's administration and one I hope is not soon forgotten!
Chris June 14, 2010, 2:59 p.m.
SHAME ON YOU UVIC! Even here in Toronto we are aware of what is happening on your campus and are sickened by it. Sounds like this whole thing has been handled poorly from the beginning. If the University says they are or were listening to the community, the phone is clearly off the hook. :(
Chris June 14, 2010, 2:59 p.m.
SHAME ON YOU UVIC! Even here in Toronto we are aware of what is happening on your campus and are sickened by it. Sounds like this whole thing has been handled poorly from the beginning. If the University says they are or were listening to the community, the phone is clearly off the hook. :(
David Foster June 14, 2010, 4:59 p.m.
As a member of the UVic senate myself I agree much more consulatation with students is required on all university policies. All the same consultation woudl not likely have changed the current situation with the cull, there are far too many rabbits and the population needs to be reduced. They are not wildife, neither are they
former petsbut rather the descendants of abandoned former pets.The current severe overcrowding of the rabbit population on campus means they get run over on Ring Road every day, and many are also diseased, inbred and full of parasites. Killing them humanely is the only cost-effective solution when we have over 1000 rabbits too many! Feral rabbits do not make good pets either, try picking one up, seriously, they can be quite vicious.
David Foster June 14, 2010, 4:59 p.m.
As a member of the UVic senate myself I agree much more consulatation with students is required on all university policies. All the same consultation woudl not likely have changed the current situation with the cull, there are far too many rabbits and the population needs to be reduced. They are not wildife, neither are they
former petsbut rather the descendants of abandoned former pets.The current severe overcrowding of the rabbit population on campus means they get run over on Ring Road every day, and many are also diseased, inbred and full of parasites. Killing them humanely is the only cost-effective solution when we have over 1000 rabbits too many! Feral rabbits do not make good pets either, try picking one up, seriously, they can be quite vicious.
Robert June 14, 2010, 6:22 p.m.
Poor David. Another poor victim of UVic's B.S. campaign! Feral? Diseased? Read how many of the initial 51 were put down. Then again maybe he knows more about rabbits than does Nick Shaw.
Robert June 14, 2010, 6:22 p.m.
Poor David. Another poor victim of UVic's B.S. campaign! Feral? Diseased? Read how many of the initial 51 were put down. Then again maybe he knows more about rabbits than does Nick Shaw.
Bernice Holtzman June 14, 2010, 9:08 p.m.
Oh please, David, no one's buying it. Any number of viable, humane, and yes,
cost-effectivesolutions have been proposed that don't involve this stupid, cruel slaughter. The university and those who support and excuse this ongoing viciousness should be thoroughly ashamed of themselves. I hope someone at the university has the courage and decency to stand up and say they made a mistake and put an end to the killing.Bernice Holtzman June 14, 2010, 9:08 p.m.
Oh please, David, no one's buying it. Any number of viable, humane, and yes,
cost-effectivesolutions have been proposed that don't involve this stupid, cruel slaughter. The university and those who support and excuse this ongoing viciousness should be thoroughly ashamed of themselves. I hope someone at the university has the courage and decency to stand up and say they made a mistake and put an end to the killing.Steve June 14, 2010, 10:11 p.m.
I live all the way down in Oklahoma and have heard this from several people. It amazes me that an institution of higher learning can have such a heartless mindset towards something like this. Let the project to sterilize them continue. What will that hurt? And on the subject of the rabbit holes being dangerous to the atheletes, I've never known them to build a home in open areas like a football field or track area. They prefer cover... Continue your fight to let the rabbits live and co-habitate with people. They are hurting no-one....
Steve June 14, 2010, 10:11 p.m.
I live all the way down in Oklahoma and have heard this from several people. It amazes me that an institution of higher learning can have such a heartless mindset towards something like this. Let the project to sterilize them continue. What will that hurt? And on the subject of the rabbit holes being dangerous to the atheletes, I've never known them to build a home in open areas like a football field or track area. They prefer cover... Continue your fight to let the rabbits live and co-habitate with people. They are hurting no-one....
Niki June 15, 2010, 1:51 p.m.
It has become obvious that UVic is not taking responsibility for the LARGE group of rabbits that call campus their home as well. A large amount of the publicity has been catered towards UVic's decision to go forth with a cull and not telling the whole story. We don't know when the cull will stop or if it ever will? It is the responsibility of UVic to provide accurate and detailed information over this matter that has become very public. We don't need a sugar coated response from them. As a student I find this all very disheartening, having written letters as many others have and it seems we all get the same or no response. There are options out there and one major problem is UVic is trying to say there isn't when they know full well there is always another solution to killing these animals. Animals who have tried for so many years to share a home on campus and now they are being regarded as an inconvenience. I think we all should and do expect more from the University! (we are meant to live in a world that we care and show compassion for all living beings. As a place of education and learning UVic should have stepped up and demonstrated this. Not their bottom line)
Niki June 15, 2010, 1:51 p.m.
It has become obvious that UVic is not taking responsibility for the LARGE group of rabbits that call campus their home as well. A large amount of the publicity has been catered towards UVic's decision to go forth with a cull and not telling the whole story. We don't know when the cull will stop or if it ever will? It is the responsibility of UVic to provide accurate and detailed information over this matter that has become very public. We don't need a sugar coated response from them. As a student I find this all very disheartening, having written letters as many others have and it seems we all get the same or no response. There are options out there and one major problem is UVic is trying to say there isn't when they know full well there is always another solution to killing these animals. Animals who have tried for so many years to share a home on campus and now they are being regarded as an inconvenience. I think we all should and do expect more from the University! (we are meant to live in a world that we care and show compassion for all living beings. As a place of education and learning UVic should have stepped up and demonstrated this. Not their bottom line)
Tami S June 15, 2010, 2:59 p.m.
Dear David, I wish you realized how silly and brainwashed by UVic your comments on the feral rabbits sounded -
Feral rabbits do not make good pets either, try picking one up, seriously, they can be quite vicious.David, I just met a man yesterday who had taken in a feral bitch (dog), named Ginger, who'd had 6 puppies whilst living on a garbage dump, at only 7 months old herself. Initially, when captured, she'd been frightened, and fighting for her life, and the lives of her puppies. She'd been aggressive and very wary. He's had her for a few months now, and she is the most tame, obedient, trustworthy, and loving dog I've ever met. Think about it David, if you were a frightened feral rabbit picked-up by the scruff of the neck by some stranger, would you behave like a pet rabbit, or would you fight for your life, on the assumption that you were just about to be killed? Does that mean that you'd continue to behave like that once you realized that someone was going to provide you with food, warmth, love and kindness? No, you'd be like Ginger, grateful and loving. I hate to contradict you, but ferals can make wonderful pets. As for diseases, I'm sorry, what a load of cow dung. My own son was once bitten by our pet rabbit when he scared her badly by accident. Later that evening, he developed a rash, and fever, which worried me, as I thought he might have picked something up. I went to hospital, and the hospital doctor searched for any disease known to be easily transmitted from rabbit to human which might account for the sickness. In short, there was none! He couldn't find a single illness prone to being transferred from rabbits to humans like that! His co-incidental illness was completely unrelated! Diseased creatures my aunt fanny!!! UVic have filled your head with a load of non-sense in the hopes that it justifies their actions. It doesn't. As you can see from the people here from as far away as the USA, and Britain, UVic's actions are unjustifiable. End of story. They need to rethink their population control strategy. Now!Tami S June 15, 2010, 2:59 p.m.
Dear David, I wish you realized how silly and brainwashed by UVic your comments on the feral rabbits sounded -
Feral rabbits do not make good pets either, try picking one up, seriously, they can be quite vicious.David, I just met a man yesterday who had taken in a feral bitch (dog), named Ginger, who'd had 6 puppies whilst living on a garbage dump, at only 7 months old herself. Initially, when captured, she'd been frightened, and fighting for her life, and the lives of her puppies. She'd been aggressive and very wary. He's had her for a few months now, and she is the most tame, obedient, trustworthy, and loving dog I've ever met. Think about it David, if you were a frightened feral rabbit picked-up by the scruff of the neck by some stranger, would you behave like a pet rabbit, or would you fight for your life, on the assumption that you were just about to be killed? Does that mean that you'd continue to behave like that once you realized that someone was going to provide you with food, warmth, love and kindness? No, you'd be like Ginger, grateful and loving. I hate to contradict you, but ferals can make wonderful pets. As for diseases, I'm sorry, what a load of cow dung. My own son was once bitten by our pet rabbit when he scared her badly by accident. Later that evening, he developed a rash, and fever, which worried me, as I thought he might have picked something up. I went to hospital, and the hospital doctor searched for any disease known to be easily transmitted from rabbit to human which might account for the sickness. In short, there was none! He couldn't find a single illness prone to being transferred from rabbits to humans like that! His co-incidental illness was completely unrelated! Diseased creatures my aunt fanny!!! UVic have filled your head with a load of non-sense in the hopes that it justifies their actions. It doesn't. As you can see from the people here from as far away as the USA, and Britain, UVic's actions are unjustifiable. End of story. They need to rethink their population control strategy. Now!Robert June 15, 2010, 3:49 p.m.
Why is the university taking the easy way out? Finding a humane way of handling this situation could be a learning experience and possibly a profitable experience when UVic solves the problem humanely and can export the method to other areas with similar problems.
Robert June 15, 2010, 3:49 p.m.
Why is the university taking the easy way out? Finding a humane way of handling this situation could be a learning experience and possibly a profitable experience when UVic solves the problem humanely and can export the method to other areas with similar problems.
Beatrice June 15, 2010, 5:09 p.m.
I would like to see David Foster's Veterinarian Degree, if he does not have one, then he is not entitled to justify the animal cruelty highly supported by the Uvic Administrators and by a member of the UVic senate himself.
Violent acts toward animals have long been recognized as indicators of a violent psychopathology that does not confine itself to animals.
Anyone who has accustomed himself to regard the life of any living creature as worthless is in danger of arriving also at the idea of worthless human lives,wrote humanitarian Albert Schweitzer.Murderers...very often start out by killing and torturing animals as kids,according to Robert K. Resler, who developed profiles of serial killers for the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). Studies have now convinced sociologists, lawmakers, and the courts that acts of cruelty toward animals deserve our attention. They can be the first sign of a violent pathology that includes humans.Animal abuse is not just the result of a minor personality flaw in the abuser, but a symptom of a deep disturbance. Research in psychology and criminology shows that people who commit acts of cruelty against animals don't stop there; many of them move on to their fellow humans.
UVic Students pay their tuitions which covers just 1/3 of their cost,the rest comes from tax payers pocket. The decision to cull the bunnies using UVic budget, under the Pest Control excuse, is my concern as a tax payer.
Dave put your brain in gear before opening your mouth. Your comments make absolutely no sense.
Beatrice June 15, 2010, 5:09 p.m.
I would like to see David Foster's Veterinarian Degree, if he does not have one, then he is not entitled to justify the animal cruelty highly supported by the Uvic Administrators and by a member of the UVic senate himself.
Violent acts toward animals have long been recognized as indicators of a violent psychopathology that does not confine itself to animals.
Anyone who has accustomed himself to regard the life of any living creature as worthless is in danger of arriving also at the idea of worthless human lives,wrote humanitarian Albert Schweitzer.Murderers...very often start out by killing and torturing animals as kids,according to Robert K. Resler, who developed profiles of serial killers for the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). Studies have now convinced sociologists, lawmakers, and the courts that acts of cruelty toward animals deserve our attention. They can be the first sign of a violent pathology that includes humans.Animal abuse is not just the result of a minor personality flaw in the abuser, but a symptom of a deep disturbance. Research in psychology and criminology shows that people who commit acts of cruelty against animals don't stop there; many of them move on to their fellow humans.
UVic Students pay their tuitions which covers just 1/3 of their cost,the rest comes from tax payers pocket. The decision to cull the bunnies using UVic budget, under the Pest Control excuse, is my concern as a tax payer.
Dave put your brain in gear before opening your mouth. Your comments make absolutely no sense.
Caroline June 16, 2010, 12:18 p.m.
Ideally, all of these rabbits should be examined and treated for any health concerns, spayed/neutered and adopted out or given a confined, safe area to live out their lives where they can be monitored and treated for ailments if need be. Ideally. However, this is not likely what will happen, but not impossible and I do think that if given the chance, enough people would volunteer for this cause. I know I would.
In my opinion, TNR is NOT the best solution but at least it gives some of them a chance. I do struggle with the idea of a TNR taking place and then having the rabbits suffer in silence and hiding from whatever complications might arise. I would rather see them be humanely killed than suffer a long, painful drawn out
naturaldeath. As long as there are rabbits on campus, this slow death will be happening probably daily by many of these dear animals. I shudder to think of how many are in pain, sick and slowly dying for each seemingly healthy visible one. The problem with a mass cull or killing is that it does not give the benefit of the doubt to any of them. Many of the rabbits on campus have the potential to be wonderful, healthy pets with a full life of 10 years ahead of them and for them to be senselessly killed is just horrible.The SPCA mission statement goes:
1) Freedom from hunger and thirst -
UVic rabbits are hungry and they are dehydrated at times. People feeding them an inconsistent diet of sugary foods like carrots does not a complete meal make. They also need a constant supply of clean water and this is not available to them, especially in the summer time.
2) Freedom from pain, injury and disease -
UVic rabbits do suffer injury, pain, diseases and parasites and do not have any relief or treatment
3) Freedom from distress -
UVic rabbits are always on guard, competing for food, harassed by children, other animals, students and cars - terribly stressful environment
4) Freedom from discomfort -
see #2
5) Freedom to express behaviours that promote well being. -
UVic rabbits can do this when they are not suffering from #1-4.
As I see it, there is great suffering amongst the majority of the rabbits at the UVic campus. Prey animals do not show their discomfort until it is to the point where they are ready to succumb completely. It is their instinct to put on a brave front so they will not be singled out and killed - it is the will to live. It is that bravery they exhibit that we are betraying by killing them and not giving them a chance to flourish in a safe environment. I will do all that I can to work toward this
safe environmentoutcome for the ones on campus now and the immediate future. In the long term, I hope to not see any rabbits on campus or anywhere else where they will not get the care that they need. The idea of havingrabbit zoneswithout proper enclosures/care is beyond asinine and will just perpetuate the abuse the rabbits endure from children, students and disturbed members of the community.For now, it is our responsibility to do what we can for those ones we can and that is what fuels me to keep fighting for the voiceless victims, the rabbits.
Caroline June 16, 2010, 12:18 p.m.
Ideally, all of these rabbits should be examined and treated for any health concerns, spayed/neutered and adopted out or given a confined, safe area to live out their lives where they can be monitored and treated for ailments if need be. Ideally. However, this is not likely what will happen, but not impossible and I do think that if given the chance, enough people would volunteer for this cause. I know I would.
In my opinion, TNR is NOT the best solution but at least it gives some of them a chance. I do struggle with the idea of a TNR taking place and then having the rabbits suffer in silence and hiding from whatever complications might arise. I would rather see them be humanely killed than suffer a long, painful drawn out
naturaldeath. As long as there are rabbits on campus, this slow death will be happening probably daily by many of these dear animals. I shudder to think of how many are in pain, sick and slowly dying for each seemingly healthy visible one. The problem with a mass cull or killing is that it does not give the benefit of the doubt to any of them. Many of the rabbits on campus have the potential to be wonderful, healthy pets with a full life of 10 years ahead of them and for them to be senselessly killed is just horrible.The SPCA mission statement goes:
1) Freedom from hunger and thirst -
UVic rabbits are hungry and they are dehydrated at times. People feeding them an inconsistent diet of sugary foods like carrots does not a complete meal make. They also need a constant supply of clean water and this is not available to them, especially in the summer time.
2) Freedom from pain, injury and disease -
UVic rabbits do suffer injury, pain, diseases and parasites and do not have any relief or treatment
3) Freedom from distress -
UVic rabbits are always on guard, competing for food, harassed by children, other animals, students and cars - terribly stressful environment
4) Freedom from discomfort -
see #2
5) Freedom to express behaviours that promote well being. -
UVic rabbits can do this when they are not suffering from #1-4.
As I see it, there is great suffering amongst the majority of the rabbits at the UVic campus. Prey animals do not show their discomfort until it is to the point where they are ready to succumb completely. It is their instinct to put on a brave front so they will not be singled out and killed - it is the will to live. It is that bravery they exhibit that we are betraying by killing them and not giving them a chance to flourish in a safe environment. I will do all that I can to work toward this
safe environmentoutcome for the ones on campus now and the immediate future. In the long term, I hope to not see any rabbits on campus or anywhere else where they will not get the care that they need. The idea of havingrabbit zoneswithout proper enclosures/care is beyond asinine and will just perpetuate the abuse the rabbits endure from children, students and disturbed members of the community.For now, it is our responsibility to do what we can for those ones we can and that is what fuels me to keep fighting for the voiceless victims, the rabbits.
alexia June 16, 2010, 2:51 p.m.
It is shameful that UVIC is discouraging participation from the community. The rabbits do not belong to UVIC, any more than they belong to anybody in particular. If this situation escalates, and UVIC continues to refuse to adopt non-lethal solutions to the rabbit issue, their reputation is going to be permanently tarnished.
alexia June 16, 2010, 2:51 p.m.
It is shameful that UVIC is discouraging participation from the community. The rabbits do not belong to UVIC, any more than they belong to anybody in particular. If this situation escalates, and UVIC continues to refuse to adopt non-lethal solutions to the rabbit issue, their reputation is going to be permanently tarnished.
Roslyn Cassells June 16, 2010, 3:51 p.m.
from Action for UVic Rabbits facebook: Here is the email list for university administrators, government officials, and relevant organizations and media: please copy and paste this list and send a brief email opposing the killing of the abandoned pet rabbits at UVic: University of Victoria President Dave Turpin dturpin@uvic.ca, UVic Facilities Manager Tom Smith tomfmgt@uvic.ca, Vice-President Finance and Operations Gayle Gorrill vpfo@uvic.ca, Chancellor Murray Farmer and Chair Board of Governors Ray Protti usec3@uvic.ca, Minister of Advanced Learning in BC ALMD.Minister@gov.bc.ca, UVic Purchasing jbraybro@uvic.ca, Victoria News editor@vicnews.com, Saanich News editor@saanichnews.com, Oak Bay News editor@oakbaynews.com, Times Colonist letters@tc.canwest.com, Province provletters@theprovince.com, Vancouver Sun sunletters@vancouversun.com, Globe and Mail letters@globeandmail.com, Sooke News Mirror editor@sookenewsmirror.com, BCSPCA Wildlife Services Sara Dubois sdubois@spca.bc.ca, BCSPCA CEO Craig Daniell cdaniell@spca.bc.ca, BCSPCA Head of Cruelty Investigations mmoriarty@spca.bc.ca, Victoria SPCA Penny Stone pstone@spca.bc.ca, BC Minister of the Environment env.minister@gov.bc.ca, Premier of BC premier@gov.bc.ca, Ministry of Environment Regional Wildlife Manager for Vancouver Island Don.Cadden@gov.bc.ca, Oak Bay Council obcouncil@oakbay.ca, Mayor of Saanich mayor@saanich.ca, Victoria Councillors councillors@victoria.ca, President University of British Columbia Stephen Troope presidents.office@ubc.ca, Royal Roads President allan.cahoon@royalroads.ca, BC Principals and Vice Principals Association bcpvpa@bcpvpa.bc.ca, Finance critic bruce.ralston.mla@leg.bc.ca, Advanced Education Critic dawn.black.mla@leg.bc.ca, Deputy Finance Critic doug.donaldson.mla@leg.bc.ca, Deputy Advanced Education critic michelle.mungall.mla@leg.bc.ca, Saanich South MLA and Private Members Bill for Rabbits lana.popham.mla@leg.bc.ca, Environment critic rob.fleming.mla@leg.bc.ca, Tourism critic spencer.herbert.mla@leg.bc.ca, Deputy Environment critic michael.sather.mla@leg.bc.ca, Public Safety and Solicitor General critic mike.farnworth.mla@leg.bc.ca, Labour critic raj.chouhan.mla@leg.bc.ca, Federal Environment Minister Jim.Prentice@ec.gc.ca
Roslyn Cassells June 16, 2010, 3:51 p.m.
from Action for UVic Rabbits facebook: Here is the email list for university administrators, government officials, and relevant organizations and media: please copy and paste this list and send a brief email opposing the killing of the abandoned pet rabbits at UVic: University of Victoria President Dave Turpin dturpin@uvic.ca, UVic Facilities Manager Tom Smith tomfmgt@uvic.ca, Vice-President Finance and Operations Gayle Gorrill vpfo@uvic.ca, Chancellor Murray Farmer and Chair Board of Governors Ray Protti usec3@uvic.ca, Minister of Advanced Learning in BC ALMD.Minister@gov.bc.ca, UVic Purchasing jbraybro@uvic.ca, Victoria News editor@vicnews.com, Saanich News editor@saanichnews.com, Oak Bay News editor@oakbaynews.com, Times Colonist letters@tc.canwest.com, Province provletters@theprovince.com, Vancouver Sun sunletters@vancouversun.com, Globe and Mail letters@globeandmail.com, Sooke News Mirror editor@sookenewsmirror.com, BCSPCA Wildlife Services Sara Dubois sdubois@spca.bc.ca, BCSPCA CEO Craig Daniell cdaniell@spca.bc.ca, BCSPCA Head of Cruelty Investigations mmoriarty@spca.bc.ca, Victoria SPCA Penny Stone pstone@spca.bc.ca, BC Minister of the Environment env.minister@gov.bc.ca, Premier of BC premier@gov.bc.ca, Ministry of Environment Regional Wildlife Manager for Vancouver Island Don.Cadden@gov.bc.ca, Oak Bay Council obcouncil@oakbay.ca, Mayor of Saanich mayor@saanich.ca, Victoria Councillors councillors@victoria.ca, President University of British Columbia Stephen Troope presidents.office@ubc.ca, Royal Roads President allan.cahoon@royalroads.ca, BC Principals and Vice Principals Association bcpvpa@bcpvpa.bc.ca, Finance critic bruce.ralston.mla@leg.bc.ca, Advanced Education Critic dawn.black.mla@leg.bc.ca, Deputy Finance Critic doug.donaldson.mla@leg.bc.ca, Deputy Advanced Education critic michelle.mungall.mla@leg.bc.ca, Saanich South MLA and Private Members Bill for Rabbits lana.popham.mla@leg.bc.ca, Environment critic rob.fleming.mla@leg.bc.ca, Tourism critic spencer.herbert.mla@leg.bc.ca, Deputy Environment critic michael.sather.mla@leg.bc.ca, Public Safety and Solicitor General critic mike.farnworth.mla@leg.bc.ca, Labour critic raj.chouhan.mla@leg.bc.ca, Federal Environment Minister Jim.Prentice@ec.gc.ca
Roslyn Cassells June 16, 2010, 3:57 p.m.
from Action for UVic Rabbits facebook: Topic: Report from exterminators LGL, commissioned by the VP Finance and Operations, Gayle Gorrill Excerpt From: Feral Rabbit Inventory in Selected Areas of the University of Victoria Campus Submitted to: Office fo the Vice-President Finance and Operations, University of Victoria Submitted by: LGL Limited; Environmental Research Associates July 24, 2008
Roslyn Cassells June 16, 2010, 3:57 p.m.
from Action for UVic Rabbits facebook: Topic: Report from exterminators LGL, commissioned by the VP Finance and Operations, Gayle Gorrill Excerpt From: Feral Rabbit Inventory in Selected Areas of the University of Victoria Campus Submitted to: Office fo the Vice-President Finance and Operations, University of Victoria Submitted by: LGL Limited; Environmental Research Associates July 24, 2008
Roslyn Cassells June 16, 2010, 4 p.m.
From Action for UVic Rabbits facebook: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=114989635192281&ref=ts Topic: Report from exterminators LGL, commissioned by the VP Finance and Operations, Gayle Gorrill Excerpt From: Feral Rabbit Inventory in Selected Areas of the University of Victoria Campus Submitted to: Office fo the Vice-President Finance and Operations, University of Victoria Submitted by: LGL Limited; Environmental Research Associates July 24, 2008
Roslyn Cassells June 16, 2010, 4 p.m.
From Action for UVic Rabbits facebook: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=114989635192281&ref=ts Topic: Report from exterminators LGL, commissioned by the VP Finance and Operations, Gayle Gorrill Excerpt From: Feral Rabbit Inventory in Selected Areas of the University of Victoria Campus Submitted to: Office fo the Vice-President Finance and Operations, University of Victoria Submitted by: LGL Limited; Environmental Research Associates July 24, 2008
Steven June 16, 2010, 4:05 p.m.
This could be the biggest Public Relations faux pas in the university's history! I'm in Toronto and this is big news here.. UVic the whole world is watching!
Steven June 16, 2010, 4:05 p.m.
This could be the biggest Public Relations faux pas in the university's history! I'm in Toronto and this is big news here.. UVic the whole world is watching!
Roslyn Cassells June 16, 2010, 4:06 p.m.
From Action for UVic Rabbits facebook:
Debunking the disinformation of the University of Victoria and the campus rabbits- a report by Roslyn Cassells, Canada’s first elected Green (to receive updates on the UVic rabbits join the elert list by request to roslyncassells@yahoo.ca or join the facebook above or others on the topic)“Trapping may, however, be a necessary precursor to a shooting program in order to improve the defensibility of shooting…” from a report by LGL Ltd., Environmental Research Associates, July 24, 2008, commissioned by the University of Victoria, and excerpted from “Feral Rabbit Inventory, Selected Areas of the University of Victoria Campus”
The University of Victoria has been for years conducting a misinformation campaign in order to justify their killing of abandoned domestic rabbits on campus. In order to get a clear view of the situation it is necessary to debunk the university’s purposeful misrepresentations, omissions of the facts and issues, a number of blatant fabrications, and examples of deliberate fear mongering.
The tactics used by the university are neither unique nor inventive, but their practise exposes the institution to public criticism and loss of trust. Furthermore they represent a violation of the mandate and principles by which the institution is governed, and reflect a fundamentally mendacious streak in the current administration. In the university’s Strategic Plan “A Vision for the Future - Building on Strength” Objective 32 states “Implement environmental stewardship practices that serve to make U Vic a leader in sustainability”. Objective 31 states “to implement our campus plan…informed by community input and our commitment to sustainability.” The divergence between the ideas in the Strategic Plan and the actual culture of the current administration represents a serious deficiency of leadership and lack of respect for ethical principles.
A few themes continually resurface in their handling of the issue: lack of transparency on this matter of intense public interest, secretive and undemocratic decision making processes, deliberate sabotage of any rabbit-friendly initiatives from staff, students, local residents and concerned animal advocacy groups, refusal to consider non-lethal programs despite overwhelming community support and evidence of success, refusal to accept responsibility for their lack of action on this issue, refusal to communicate frankly with concerned citizens, animal groups, and the media, and continual public misinformation campaigns designed to predispose the public to accept the mass killings the university has planned.
While other colleges such as Long Beach College in California (see Wall Street Journal article - http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303395904575158581521399358.html?mod=googlenews_wsj have taken non-lethal population control measures and used them as a teaching tool, the University of Victoria remains recalcitrant, obtuse, and regressive in their handling of this issue. Other BC municipalities such as Kelowna and Vernon have non-lethal rabbit control programs which have been up and running for years, are effective in population reduction and acceptable to the local community. The Responsible Animal Care Society has been running the popular and successful rabbit population control program in Kelowna, as well as successfully lobbying to create bylaws to protect rabbits, and educating the public about their needs.
The excerpt from the LGL Ltd. Environmental Research report speaks to the university’s desire to maintain the appearance of doing their due diligence on the rabbit issue, without any genuine interest in or intention of diverting from their planned course of killing the rabbits. The university continually refers to its “attempts” or other’s “failed” attempts at resolving the problem using non-lethal means…and holds this up as their justification for now promoting a kill. In fact the university has not done it’s due diligence and there are a number of obvious examples of this.
The university commissioned report from exterminator LGL Environmental Research Ltd. also suggests physical grounds remediation as a way to reduce rabbit habitat and therefore the rabbit population. The university has not carried out the grounds remediations recommended in the report, which would have reduced the amount of rabbit-preferred habitat on campus without costing a single life. Similar remediations are also suggested on the Ministry of Environment website.
One wonders why the university went first to an exterminator instead of their own biology department for answers to their questions. This situation provides an exciting teachable moment for students and faculty and should have been promoted as such. A sterilization program could take place on campus, with the help of the many community veterinarians who have offered their assistance (Dr. Nick Shaw from Shaw Pet Hospital, Dr. Helen Bell from Pacific Cat Clinic, Dr. Ilija Lukic, Sidney Animal Hospital, and Drs. Malcolm and Harry Bond from Salt Spring Vet Clinic), and students, staff, and other volunteers could help with the capture, recovery, adoptions, and release of the rabbits involved. Rabbit health and population dynamics could be studied, as well as other educational and public policy initiatives. Educating the public about responsible rabbit care and improving laws to protect rabbits are two points studiously ignored by the current campus administration, despite wide public interest and acceptance.
The university is constantly complaining about the “damage” the rabbits are doing to the campus grounds, and complaining about having to “clean up” the dead rabbits killed on campus roads each day. Campus staff had for years dispatched injured rabbits by brute force, pummelling them to deal with shovels and stones, instead of taking them to Wild Ark wildlife rehabilitation center or local veterinarians willing to treat them free of charge. In a Sept. 12, 2008 press release the university said “Since late 2007, the university has been gathering information on rabbit damage and safety concerns…“ and “…we’ll be able to explore non-lethal control methods, such as vegetation modifications“. As the report’s recommended grounds remediation and exclusion recommendations were not implemented, many feel that the university has no reason to voice these complaints, or suggest that non-lethal methods have failed. For in reality, the entire efforts of the administration have been to sabotage any non-lethal methods. In simple terms the rabbits are the scapegoat for the administration’s failure to address the plight of the animals at an earlier and more manageable point. The university’s cruel and regressive plan to shoot these abandoned pet rabbits illustrates the complete lack of transparency, compassion and ethical leadership at the University of Victoria.
The university commissioned a Feral Rabbit Pilot Project by Common Ground, a wildlife damage reduction company. This project was simply the scapegoat “trapping” referred to in the LGL Report, the necessary precursor to the shooting campaign and the tool to manufacture the public’s consent. The study, approved and given the go-ahead by campus administration involved sterilization of campus rabbits and their rehoming or release. The project was halted before it was completed, and declared a failure by campus administration, despite positive community response. The project details were never released to the public but many project volunteers feel that any attempt which resulted in the sterilization of rabbits is a success. Indeed, if the university put as much money into rabbit sterilization as it does into producing and publicizing misinformation on the topic, the campus rabbits would all have been sterilized by now, and a fulsome public education campaign could have been funded.
The university administration erroneously claimed the Feral Rabbit Pilot Project could not find homes for the 50 rabbits they sterilized. Project volunteers confirmed that homes or sanctuaries were found for all of the rabbits. A press conference was held at that point to source more homes or sanctuaries for the next 100 rabbits the project planned on capturing and sterilizing. The Ministry of Environment at that point informed the project participants that they would need to apply for permits for each rabbit caught, consent to premises and vehicle inspections, and permanently house the rabbits in Ministry specified pens for the remainder of their lives. This would have not allowed the rescue groups to find homes for the rabbits, or move them to other locations. Furthermore, the Ministry pens would have involved an expenditure of tens of thousands of dollars - which the groups simply could not provide at a moment’s notice. Taking in the university rabbits would have caused the groups to be less able to take in other homeless rabbits as the university rabbits would have to become permanent wards.
University administration spokespersons said the Ministry of Environment was to blame because they were now requiring permits allowing the rabbits to be placed in homes or sanctuaries. However the truth of the matter is the university knew prior to the project commencing that the necessary permits and exemptions (which would have allowed re-homing and sanctuary placements) were not in place. In other words the university let Common Ground go ahead with the plan to trap/sterilize/re-home the rabbits knowing the Ministry would clap a lid on it as soon as they became aware of it.
Campus administration constantly referring to the “failure” of the Project to place all the sterilized rabbits in adoptive homes or sanctuaries while completely ignoring their obstructive role with the Ministry of Environment. The Ministry requires permits to move wild animals, which they consider the rabbits to be, and requires the animals to be relocated within 1 kilometre of the capture site in certain areas of the province including the Victoria region. Most of the generous offers of sanctuary come from outside this tiny area (Rabbit Advocacy of BC, EARS Animal Sanctuary, TRACS - The Responsible Animal Care Society, and the Salt Spring Island SPCA). Although initially the Ministry of Environment officials simply informed the project participants of the absence of any required permissions, they had begun negotiations over possible exemptions with the project participants at the time the university halted the project.
The university alleges feral rabbits are “aggressive” while any one with any common sense knows a wild rabbit will flee from humans. Tame rabbits, conditioned by years of feeding by students, staff and visitors to the campus, will approach people offering food. This is hardly surprising and will continue as long as people continue to feed the rabbits. Other attempts at fear-mongering by the university involve claims of tetanus infections from rabbit bites. On September 12, 2008 the University of Victoria press release stated that “feeding rabbits also increases the risk of bites, and tetanus could result”. This fear mongering was compounded by equally unsubstantiated claims of “disease spread by rabbit feces” and “catastrophic injuries to athletes”. The Canadian Food Inspection Agency, which monitors common zoonotic public health concerns does not even have a reporting category for these alleged risks, nor any reports of these hyperbolic claims. Area hospitals could not confirm the allegations of “catastrophic injuries to athletes” either.
In addition to the opening excerpt of this essay which stated “Trapping may, however, be a necessary precursor to a shooting program in order to improve the defensibility of shooting…” from the LGL Environmental Consultants report submitted to the Office of the Vice-President, Finance and Operations Gayle Gorrill, the report contains other disturbing suggestions. Most telling is the fact that the report, which was never formally or willing released to the public, was in fact leaked by a horrified staff member, one of many in deep disagreement with the tactics of the current administration.
Returning to the report, LGL Environmental Consultants, who are exterminators, write “Night-time shooting using a high-velocity .177 calibre air rifle with scope design for low-light conditions is an efficient way to cull rabbits”. There is no mention of Trap Neuter Release programs (TNR) anywhere in the report, although it does make illusion to the possibility of other alternatives which would require a literature review, which for some reason LGL felt was outside of their responsibility. If the university was truly seeking a non-lethal rabbit population program, it begs the question: Why did the University of Victoria hire an exterminator to produce this report? Why did the university not use the expertise within its own ranks to provide non-lethal population control measures? And lastly, why did the university keep the report from LGL secret?
Earlier this month, the BC Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals withdrew its support for the university’s plan to do a mass killing of the campus rabbits. In a statement to the public, and reproduced on their webpage the BCSPCA threw its support behind non-lethal alternatives. The very public withdrawal of support from the province’s largest animal welfare group speaks volumes. Internationally, boycotts are being planned against the university. Locally, provincially, and nationally, the community, students, faculty, staff, alumni, and donors are, in no uncertain terms, expressing their opposition to the planned killing of campus rabbits.
The University of Victoria needs to come to its senses and join with us in our efforts to live in harmony with nature, work with our communities, and show compassion for those members of our society who cannot speak or advocate for themselves. We urge the university to show ethical leadership on this important issue. The animals have no choice, but the university does. On behalf of the animals, we ask you to choose compassion.
Roslyn Cassells
On December 24, 1967, just months before his assassination, Martin Luther King said “non-cooperation with evil is essential…we must practise non-violence for all levels of conflict…we will meet your physical force with our soul force…and one day we will win our freedom, and yours.”
A face book page has been created to promote non-lethal alternatives called Action for UVic Rabbits, one of many dedicated to saving the campus rabbits.
A petition with over 1500 signatures was delivered to University of Victoria on April 26, 2010.
Backgrounder on rabbit laws:
Municipal rabbit bylaws are gradually being adopted in many BC cities and towns. These laws generally speaking deal with issues like public education about rabbits, bans on selling unaltered animals, and bans on selling animals in pet stores.
Provincially, rabbit advocates had hoped that domestic rabbits would be afforded more protection by their removal from Schedule C when the provincial Wildlife Act was amended recently. This would have allowed them protection under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act. However, The Environmental (Species and Public Protection) Statutes Amendment Act, 2008, contained no changes pertaining to the European Rabbit - Orcytolagus cuniculus - commonly know as the domestic rabbit. This leaves the domestic rabbit, like all other mammals released into the wild, in Class C of the Wildlife Act of BC. This class of animals has little or no protection.
The release of domestic animals into the wild is a violation of the Criminal Code of Canada and an offence under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (PCA) Act of BC. However, the PCA Act does not apply to wildlife, which is how the domestic rabbits are currently classified. (see links http://www.rabbitadvocacy.com/bcs_wildlife_act_amended.htm and http://www.rabbitadvocacy.com/rabbits_and_the_wildlife_act.htm for a good overview of rabbits and the Wildlife Act courtesy of the Rabbit Advocacy Group.
Roslyn Cassells June 16, 2010, 4:06 p.m.
From Action for UVic Rabbits facebook:
Debunking the disinformation of the University of Victoria and the campus rabbits- a report by Roslyn Cassells, Canada’s first elected Green (to receive updates on the UVic rabbits join the elert list by request to roslyncassells@yahoo.ca or join the facebook above or others on the topic)“Trapping may, however, be a necessary precursor to a shooting program in order to improve the defensibility of shooting…” from a report by LGL Ltd., Environmental Research Associates, July 24, 2008, commissioned by the University of Victoria, and excerpted from “Feral Rabbit Inventory, Selected Areas of the University of Victoria Campus”
The University of Victoria has been for years conducting a misinformation campaign in order to justify their killing of abandoned domestic rabbits on campus. In order to get a clear view of the situation it is necessary to debunk the university’s purposeful misrepresentations, omissions of the facts and issues, a number of blatant fabrications, and examples of deliberate fear mongering.
The tactics used by the university are neither unique nor inventive, but their practise exposes the institution to public criticism and loss of trust. Furthermore they represent a violation of the mandate and principles by which the institution is governed, and reflect a fundamentally mendacious streak in the current administration. In the university’s Strategic Plan “A Vision for the Future - Building on Strength” Objective 32 states “Implement environmental stewardship practices that serve to make U Vic a leader in sustainability”. Objective 31 states “to implement our campus plan…informed by community input and our commitment to sustainability.” The divergence between the ideas in the Strategic Plan and the actual culture of the current administration represents a serious deficiency of leadership and lack of respect for ethical principles.
A few themes continually resurface in their handling of the issue: lack of transparency on this matter of intense public interest, secretive and undemocratic decision making processes, deliberate sabotage of any rabbit-friendly initiatives from staff, students, local residents and concerned animal advocacy groups, refusal to consider non-lethal programs despite overwhelming community support and evidence of success, refusal to accept responsibility for their lack of action on this issue, refusal to communicate frankly with concerned citizens, animal groups, and the media, and continual public misinformation campaigns designed to predispose the public to accept the mass killings the university has planned.
While other colleges such as Long Beach College in California (see Wall Street Journal article - http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303395904575158581521399358.html?mod=googlenews_wsj have taken non-lethal population control measures and used them as a teaching tool, the University of Victoria remains recalcitrant, obtuse, and regressive in their handling of this issue. Other BC municipalities such as Kelowna and Vernon have non-lethal rabbit control programs which have been up and running for years, are effective in population reduction and acceptable to the local community. The Responsible Animal Care Society has been running the popular and successful rabbit population control program in Kelowna, as well as successfully lobbying to create bylaws to protect rabbits, and educating the public about their needs.
The excerpt from the LGL Ltd. Environmental Research report speaks to the university’s desire to maintain the appearance of doing their due diligence on the rabbit issue, without any genuine interest in or intention of diverting from their planned course of killing the rabbits. The university continually refers to its “attempts” or other’s “failed” attempts at resolving the problem using non-lethal means…and holds this up as their justification for now promoting a kill. In fact the university has not done it’s due diligence and there are a number of obvious examples of this.
The university commissioned report from exterminator LGL Environmental Research Ltd. also suggests physical grounds remediation as a way to reduce rabbit habitat and therefore the rabbit population. The university has not carried out the grounds remediations recommended in the report, which would have reduced the amount of rabbit-preferred habitat on campus without costing a single life. Similar remediations are also suggested on the Ministry of Environment website.
One wonders why the university went first to an exterminator instead of their own biology department for answers to their questions. This situation provides an exciting teachable moment for students and faculty and should have been promoted as such. A sterilization program could take place on campus, with the help of the many community veterinarians who have offered their assistance (Dr. Nick Shaw from Shaw Pet Hospital, Dr. Helen Bell from Pacific Cat Clinic, Dr. Ilija Lukic, Sidney Animal Hospital, and Drs. Malcolm and Harry Bond from Salt Spring Vet Clinic), and students, staff, and other volunteers could help with the capture, recovery, adoptions, and release of the rabbits involved. Rabbit health and population dynamics could be studied, as well as other educational and public policy initiatives. Educating the public about responsible rabbit care and improving laws to protect rabbits are two points studiously ignored by the current campus administration, despite wide public interest and acceptance.
The university is constantly complaining about the “damage” the rabbits are doing to the campus grounds, and complaining about having to “clean up” the dead rabbits killed on campus roads each day. Campus staff had for years dispatched injured rabbits by brute force, pummelling them to deal with shovels and stones, instead of taking them to Wild Ark wildlife rehabilitation center or local veterinarians willing to treat them free of charge. In a Sept. 12, 2008 press release the university said “Since late 2007, the university has been gathering information on rabbit damage and safety concerns…“ and “…we’ll be able to explore non-lethal control methods, such as vegetation modifications“. As the report’s recommended grounds remediation and exclusion recommendations were not implemented, many feel that the university has no reason to voice these complaints, or suggest that non-lethal methods have failed. For in reality, the entire efforts of the administration have been to sabotage any non-lethal methods. In simple terms the rabbits are the scapegoat for the administration’s failure to address the plight of the animals at an earlier and more manageable point. The university’s cruel and regressive plan to shoot these abandoned pet rabbits illustrates the complete lack of transparency, compassion and ethical leadership at the University of Victoria.
The university commissioned a Feral Rabbit Pilot Project by Common Ground, a wildlife damage reduction company. This project was simply the scapegoat “trapping” referred to in the LGL Report, the necessary precursor to the shooting campaign and the tool to manufacture the public’s consent. The study, approved and given the go-ahead by campus administration involved sterilization of campus rabbits and their rehoming or release. The project was halted before it was completed, and declared a failure by campus administration, despite positive community response. The project details were never released to the public but many project volunteers feel that any attempt which resulted in the sterilization of rabbits is a success. Indeed, if the university put as much money into rabbit sterilization as it does into producing and publicizing misinformation on the topic, the campus rabbits would all have been sterilized by now, and a fulsome public education campaign could have been funded.
The university administration erroneously claimed the Feral Rabbit Pilot Project could not find homes for the 50 rabbits they sterilized. Project volunteers confirmed that homes or sanctuaries were found for all of the rabbits. A press conference was held at that point to source more homes or sanctuaries for the next 100 rabbits the project planned on capturing and sterilizing. The Ministry of Environment at that point informed the project participants that they would need to apply for permits for each rabbit caught, consent to premises and vehicle inspections, and permanently house the rabbits in Ministry specified pens for the remainder of their lives. This would have not allowed the rescue groups to find homes for the rabbits, or move them to other locations. Furthermore, the Ministry pens would have involved an expenditure of tens of thousands of dollars - which the groups simply could not provide at a moment’s notice. Taking in the university rabbits would have caused the groups to be less able to take in other homeless rabbits as the university rabbits would have to become permanent wards.
University administration spokespersons said the Ministry of Environment was to blame because they were now requiring permits allowing the rabbits to be placed in homes or sanctuaries. However the truth of the matter is the university knew prior to the project commencing that the necessary permits and exemptions (which would have allowed re-homing and sanctuary placements) were not in place. In other words the university let Common Ground go ahead with the plan to trap/sterilize/re-home the rabbits knowing the Ministry would clap a lid on it as soon as they became aware of it.
Campus administration constantly referring to the “failure” of the Project to place all the sterilized rabbits in adoptive homes or sanctuaries while completely ignoring their obstructive role with the Ministry of Environment. The Ministry requires permits to move wild animals, which they consider the rabbits to be, and requires the animals to be relocated within 1 kilometre of the capture site in certain areas of the province including the Victoria region. Most of the generous offers of sanctuary come from outside this tiny area (Rabbit Advocacy of BC, EARS Animal Sanctuary, TRACS - The Responsible Animal Care Society, and the Salt Spring Island SPCA). Although initially the Ministry of Environment officials simply informed the project participants of the absence of any required permissions, they had begun negotiations over possible exemptions with the project participants at the time the university halted the project.
The university alleges feral rabbits are “aggressive” while any one with any common sense knows a wild rabbit will flee from humans. Tame rabbits, conditioned by years of feeding by students, staff and visitors to the campus, will approach people offering food. This is hardly surprising and will continue as long as people continue to feed the rabbits. Other attempts at fear-mongering by the university involve claims of tetanus infections from rabbit bites. On September 12, 2008 the University of Victoria press release stated that “feeding rabbits also increases the risk of bites, and tetanus could result”. This fear mongering was compounded by equally unsubstantiated claims of “disease spread by rabbit feces” and “catastrophic injuries to athletes”. The Canadian Food Inspection Agency, which monitors common zoonotic public health concerns does not even have a reporting category for these alleged risks, nor any reports of these hyperbolic claims. Area hospitals could not confirm the allegations of “catastrophic injuries to athletes” either.
In addition to the opening excerpt of this essay which stated “Trapping may, however, be a necessary precursor to a shooting program in order to improve the defensibility of shooting…” from the LGL Environmental Consultants report submitted to the Office of the Vice-President, Finance and Operations Gayle Gorrill, the report contains other disturbing suggestions. Most telling is the fact that the report, which was never formally or willing released to the public, was in fact leaked by a horrified staff member, one of many in deep disagreement with the tactics of the current administration.
Returning to the report, LGL Environmental Consultants, who are exterminators, write “Night-time shooting using a high-velocity .177 calibre air rifle with scope design for low-light conditions is an efficient way to cull rabbits”. There is no mention of Trap Neuter Release programs (TNR) anywhere in the report, although it does make illusion to the possibility of other alternatives which would require a literature review, which for some reason LGL felt was outside of their responsibility. If the university was truly seeking a non-lethal rabbit population program, it begs the question: Why did the University of Victoria hire an exterminator to produce this report? Why did the university not use the expertise within its own ranks to provide non-lethal population control measures? And lastly, why did the university keep the report from LGL secret?
Earlier this month, the BC Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals withdrew its support for the university’s plan to do a mass killing of the campus rabbits. In a statement to the public, and reproduced on their webpage the BCSPCA threw its support behind non-lethal alternatives. The very public withdrawal of support from the province’s largest animal welfare group speaks volumes. Internationally, boycotts are being planned against the university. Locally, provincially, and nationally, the community, students, faculty, staff, alumni, and donors are, in no uncertain terms, expressing their opposition to the planned killing of campus rabbits.
The University of Victoria needs to come to its senses and join with us in our efforts to live in harmony with nature, work with our communities, and show compassion for those members of our society who cannot speak or advocate for themselves. We urge the university to show ethical leadership on this important issue. The animals have no choice, but the university does. On behalf of the animals, we ask you to choose compassion.
Roslyn Cassells
On December 24, 1967, just months before his assassination, Martin Luther King said “non-cooperation with evil is essential…we must practise non-violence for all levels of conflict…we will meet your physical force with our soul force…and one day we will win our freedom, and yours.”
A face book page has been created to promote non-lethal alternatives called Action for UVic Rabbits, one of many dedicated to saving the campus rabbits.
A petition with over 1500 signatures was delivered to University of Victoria on April 26, 2010.
Backgrounder on rabbit laws:
Municipal rabbit bylaws are gradually being adopted in many BC cities and towns. These laws generally speaking deal with issues like public education about rabbits, bans on selling unaltered animals, and bans on selling animals in pet stores.
Provincially, rabbit advocates had hoped that domestic rabbits would be afforded more protection by their removal from Schedule C when the provincial Wildlife Act was amended recently. This would have allowed them protection under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act. However, The Environmental (Species and Public Protection) Statutes Amendment Act, 2008, contained no changes pertaining to the European Rabbit - Orcytolagus cuniculus - commonly know as the domestic rabbit. This leaves the domestic rabbit, like all other mammals released into the wild, in Class C of the Wildlife Act of BC. This class of animals has little or no protection.
The release of domestic animals into the wild is a violation of the Criminal Code of Canada and an offence under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (PCA) Act of BC. However, the PCA Act does not apply to wildlife, which is how the domestic rabbits are currently classified. (see links http://www.rabbitadvocacy.com/bcs_wildlife_act_amended.htm and http://www.rabbitadvocacy.com/rabbits_and_the_wildlife_act.htm for a good overview of rabbits and the Wildlife Act courtesy of the Rabbit Advocacy Group.
Roslyn Cassells June 16, 2010, 4:11 p.m.
MENDACITY AND BLOODSHED AT THE UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA AS THOUSANDS OF ABANDONED PET RABBITS ARE SLAUGHTERED ON CAMPUS
Once again, the University of Victoria has come to international attention…not for its academic performance…but for its ruthless attacks on the vulnerable. The latest example is their decision to kill the large population of abandoned pet rabbits on campus. Like a mutant Wizard of Oz character, missing both a heart and a brain, the university is unwilling to embrace non-lethal solutions put forward by the community…instead preferring to shoot the friendly creatures.
But, like the disabled student the university tried to evict from student housing even though he was still actively studying, and the homeless man students called “the Professor” who for years recycled university garbage in the absence of an effective ecological institutional waste management program, the rabbits have found their place in the hearts of UVic students, staff, and faculty.
The treatment of students, staff, and the public who are opposed to the killing by campus administration has made many realize that this is a political issue, and an extreme case of abuse of authority, not just an animal welfare and ecological concern. In addition to subtle and not-so-subtle verbal warnings, a heavy-handed and repressive administration has handed out threatening letters to those on campus (and off) stating their intention to stifle dissent over the rabbit killing through academic and non-academic sanctions, non-renewal of employment contracts, and legal action.
After the recent midnight bulldozing of the community garden ordered by the administration, there are many who have questioned their ethics and actions. Despite statements that the university is committed to environmental leadership and community consultation, their actions have spoken volumes about their true intent, and the mendacious nature of the current administration.
A leaked report from UVic’s Finance and Operations department illustrates the strategy used to manufacture public consent for the killing. “Trapping may, however, be a necessary precursor to a shooting program in order to improve the defensibility of shooting…” wrote the exterminator hired by U Vic in his 2008 report. This opening excerpt speaks to the university’s desire to maintain the appearance of doing their due diligence on the rabbit issue, without any genuine interest in or intention of diverting from their planned course of killing the rabbits. The university continually refers to its “attempts” or others’ “failed” attempts at resolving the problem using non-lethal means…and holds this up as their justification for a kill. In fact the university has not done it’s due diligence and there are a number of obvious examples of this. To make matters worst, university officials have repeatedly and knowingly disseminated misinformation about the rabbits for years, with the express purpose of manufacturing the public’s consent for a mass kill.
Ignoring, undermining, and misrepresenting various initiatives put forward over the years by the community, UVic maintains a stance of wilful ignorance with respect to feasible non-lethal alternatives. The deliberate sabotage of the university funded Feral Rabbit Pilot Project is a case in point. While the university presents this as a “failed attempt,” those involved directly in the project said they were making good headway when the university cancelled the project part way through. Excluding the contractor Common Ground from negotiations with the Ministry of Environment, the university ensured the project lacked the necessary permits required under provincial law, despite the Ministry’s willingness to issue same. Other purposefully inaccurate comments the university repeats about the program include the cost per rabbit as being over $300, when in fact much of the work was done for free by concerned veterinarians. In fact, Victoria veterinarian Nick Shaw, who owns a string of veterinary clinics, has repeatedly offered the university his services to neuter all the campus rabbits free of charge.
One wonders why the university went first to an exterminator (LGL Environmental Consulting Ltd.) and an animal experimenter (Michele Martin of the BC Cancer Agency) instead of their own biology department for answers to their questions. If their true intent was to foster community and ecology, why does the university not consult with their own academics, students, and staff…as well as the community at large? UVic has been approached repeatedly over the years by rabbit rescue groups, willing to sterilize and rehome the animals free of charge. Had the university accepted any of these offers when they were made, the population of rabbits would never have increased to its current number. This would have provided the university with an opportunity to partner with the community in leadership in ecological matters, instead of becoming an international pariah due to their cruelty and ignorance.
In an attempt to starve the rabbits to death while pretending to “do something“ about the rabbit population, the university posted signs on campus telling people not to feed the hungry animals. Students and staff have names for “their rabbits” and the rabbits they feed have come to depend on their daily meal to survive. Those trying to help the rabbits are living in a state of cognitive dissonance. On one hand they can see and feel the need of these vulnerable creatures who they walk by every day. On the other hand they have been told by their employer or university to ignore their obvious needs, with the rabbits hopping after them expectantly. This has caused a toxic work and study environment at UVic, a serious workplace stress issue ignored by workplace health and safety officials on campus.
The university has also been poisoning baby rabbits and other animals, using a highly toxic anti-coagulant called bromadiolone. This compound, which is ten times stronger than warfarin, is being used around buildings and in wooded areas accessible to wildlife. This is a violation of federal and provincial laws and regulations, and a good example of UVic’s disregard for the ecology. The poison, which remains in the system for around 28 days, is passed on to predators (such as crows, hawks, owls, coyotes, fox, cats and dogs) who eat the effected prey species (such as baby rabbits, red squirrels, black squirrels, field mice and birds) who have died from the poison, or are weakened from internal bleeding and slow to escape the predators. Bromadiolone poisoning causes much pain and suffering, and the university should be held accountable for its widespread use of this dangerous compound.
Federal and provincial environment officials, and the BC Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (the body that enforces the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act) must enforce their respective laws, acts, and regulations in this clear-cut case of deliberate and dangerous misuse of a dangerous substance causing suffering and death to protected, red-listed, and endangered wildlife as well as non-target species that fall under the jurisdiction of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act.
The shooting, trapping, and poisoning of female rabbits has the additional consequence of the slow and agonizing deaths of their nursing babies, whose painful and lingering deaths occur deep in their burrows away from public scrutiny. Grounds crew have been told to fill in the burrows with earth. This will smother the inhabitants and prevent remaining babies from appearing above ground, their suffering visible to all.
Other municipalities have instituted non-lethal sterilization programs in combination with bylaws to prohibit the sale of fertile rabbits in pet stores. In Trap, Neuter, Release plans, the rabbits are adopted, relocated, or released following their surgery. In places where there are colonies of released sterilized animals, the population gradually reduces through attrition, and maintains an overall improved health profile. Now the standard in the civilized world, TNR has been dismissed and ignored by campus administration. This, despite the success of similar programs elsewhere, most recently at Long Beach College in California. There, an on-campus clinic and adoption site has been established, and vets and volunteers donate their time.
Calgary, Vernon, and Kelowna have instituted humane non-lethal rabbit control programs which have been well-received in their local communities. Kelowna, in fact, initially took a regressive approach, hiring a contractor to kill the abandoned pet rabbits in their community. For a period of two years, rabbits were cruelly exterminated in the city. Neighbours fought neighbours, debates became disturbances, protests grew and grew, property was vandalized, tourists noticed and took the story home with them, and the city became the butt of editorial cartoons far and wide. When a Youtube video of one of the exterminators stomping a rabbit to death went viral, Kelowna city council was forced to back down and stop the bloodbath.
Roxanne Woldenga, a humane rabbit control contractor from Kelowna commented in April: “Victoria is about to go through an ugly, heartbreaking chapter in its history for no better reasons than the ego and ignorance of those who have been placed in positions of responsibility for the lives and deaths of UVic’s…rabbits.” Wodenga advises a community-based approach is necessary for the rabbits to be saved, commenting “In the end, Kelowna adopted a humane solution of live capture, sex separation, foster programs for appropriate animals and sanctuaries for those remaining. Food, care and bedding are provided by a combination of public and private funds and volunteer labour. Of the original fifteen hundred feral rabbits condemned to die, more than one thousand were saved.”
A petition of over 1500 signatures was presented to the university in April and a number of others are currently doing the rounds. A plethora of media reports, face book pages and websites abound with information on this issue, and people from all sectors of society are expressing their concerns and getting involved. Internationally, a boycott of the University of Victoria is being organized, and other universities and animal welfare groups are contacting U Vic to express their opposition to their killing plan. On an individual basis, many alumni have expressed their horror and anger at their alma mater’s regressive stance. Current and prospective students have stated their decision to withdraw their registration, and elementary and high school students are getting involved in the issue as well. Tourism is being effected as the word spreads internationally, and UVic and the city of Victoria have become the butt of editorial cartoons and the subject of satire.
The rabbits are paying with their lives for the cruelty, ignorance, and morally bankrupt behaviour of those at the highest levels of the University of Victoria. President Dave Turpin (pres@uvic.ca), Chancellor Murray Farmer, Chair Board of Governors Ray Protti (both at usec3@uvic.ca), and Vice President Finance and Operations Gayle Gorrill (vpfo@uvic.ca). These are the individuals who are responsible for this horror. Ray Protti, prior to his installation at U Vic, was the Director of CSIS in Ottawa, and the CEO of the Canadian Bankers Association. As individuals, as administrators, their legacy will be one of violence and cruelty...their losses will be personal, professional, academic, and economic. The blood of these gentle animals is on their hands, and the reputation of the University of Victoria will be tarnished forever.
Barry Penner, a UVic alumnus is also BC’s Environment Minister (env.min@gov.bc.ca or barry.penner.mla@gov.bc.ca ) Sara Dubois is the BCSPCA’s Wildlife Services manager sdubois@spca.bc.ca and Marci Moriarty is the BCSPCA’s Head of Cruelty Investigations mmoriarty@spca.bc.ca and Craig Daniel is the CEO of the BCSPCA cdaniel@spca.bc.ca The federal Minister of the Environment is Jim Prentice Jim.Prentice@ec.gc.ca
A number of initiatives are underway to help the rabbits, and more information and the most current updates can be found on the Action for UVic Rabbits face book page. If you have trouble finding the page, go to Roslyn Cassells facebook and I will send you the link or email me (see below). The Rabbit Advocacy of BC website at www.rabbitadvocacy.com is also a good source of information. A rabbit email alert has been set up and anyone wanting to help the rabbits and stay informed on this issue can send a request to roslyncassells@yahoo.ca to be added to this list.
Roslyn Cassells is a BC based social justice activist and Canada's first elected Green. She is an ardent animal and human rights activist, and writes, teaches and campaigns for positive social, economic and ecological change everywhere.
Roslyn Cassells June 16, 2010, 4:11 p.m.
MENDACITY AND BLOODSHED AT THE UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA AS THOUSANDS OF ABANDONED PET RABBITS ARE SLAUGHTERED ON CAMPUS
Once again, the University of Victoria has come to international attention…not for its academic performance…but for its ruthless attacks on the vulnerable. The latest example is their decision to kill the large population of abandoned pet rabbits on campus. Like a mutant Wizard of Oz character, missing both a heart and a brain, the university is unwilling to embrace non-lethal solutions put forward by the community…instead preferring to shoot the friendly creatures.
But, like the disabled student the university tried to evict from student housing even though he was still actively studying, and the homeless man students called “the Professor” who for years recycled university garbage in the absence of an effective ecological institutional waste management program, the rabbits have found their place in the hearts of UVic students, staff, and faculty.
The treatment of students, staff, and the public who are opposed to the killing by campus administration has made many realize that this is a political issue, and an extreme case of abuse of authority, not just an animal welfare and ecological concern. In addition to subtle and not-so-subtle verbal warnings, a heavy-handed and repressive administration has handed out threatening letters to those on campus (and off) stating their intention to stifle dissent over the rabbit killing through academic and non-academic sanctions, non-renewal of employment contracts, and legal action.
After the recent midnight bulldozing of the community garden ordered by the administration, there are many who have questioned their ethics and actions. Despite statements that the university is committed to environmental leadership and community consultation, their actions have spoken volumes about their true intent, and the mendacious nature of the current administration.
A leaked report from UVic’s Finance and Operations department illustrates the strategy used to manufacture public consent for the killing. “Trapping may, however, be a necessary precursor to a shooting program in order to improve the defensibility of shooting…” wrote the exterminator hired by U Vic in his 2008 report. This opening excerpt speaks to the university’s desire to maintain the appearance of doing their due diligence on the rabbit issue, without any genuine interest in or intention of diverting from their planned course of killing the rabbits. The university continually refers to its “attempts” or others’ “failed” attempts at resolving the problem using non-lethal means…and holds this up as their justification for a kill. In fact the university has not done it’s due diligence and there are a number of obvious examples of this. To make matters worst, university officials have repeatedly and knowingly disseminated misinformation about the rabbits for years, with the express purpose of manufacturing the public’s consent for a mass kill.
Ignoring, undermining, and misrepresenting various initiatives put forward over the years by the community, UVic maintains a stance of wilful ignorance with respect to feasible non-lethal alternatives. The deliberate sabotage of the university funded Feral Rabbit Pilot Project is a case in point. While the university presents this as a “failed attempt,” those involved directly in the project said they were making good headway when the university cancelled the project part way through. Excluding the contractor Common Ground from negotiations with the Ministry of Environment, the university ensured the project lacked the necessary permits required under provincial law, despite the Ministry’s willingness to issue same. Other purposefully inaccurate comments the university repeats about the program include the cost per rabbit as being over $300, when in fact much of the work was done for free by concerned veterinarians. In fact, Victoria veterinarian Nick Shaw, who owns a string of veterinary clinics, has repeatedly offered the university his services to neuter all the campus rabbits free of charge.
One wonders why the university went first to an exterminator (LGL Environmental Consulting Ltd.) and an animal experimenter (Michele Martin of the BC Cancer Agency) instead of their own biology department for answers to their questions. If their true intent was to foster community and ecology, why does the university not consult with their own academics, students, and staff…as well as the community at large? UVic has been approached repeatedly over the years by rabbit rescue groups, willing to sterilize and rehome the animals free of charge. Had the university accepted any of these offers when they were made, the population of rabbits would never have increased to its current number. This would have provided the university with an opportunity to partner with the community in leadership in ecological matters, instead of becoming an international pariah due to their cruelty and ignorance.
In an attempt to starve the rabbits to death while pretending to “do something“ about the rabbit population, the university posted signs on campus telling people not to feed the hungry animals. Students and staff have names for “their rabbits” and the rabbits they feed have come to depend on their daily meal to survive. Those trying to help the rabbits are living in a state of cognitive dissonance. On one hand they can see and feel the need of these vulnerable creatures who they walk by every day. On the other hand they have been told by their employer or university to ignore their obvious needs, with the rabbits hopping after them expectantly. This has caused a toxic work and study environment at UVic, a serious workplace stress issue ignored by workplace health and safety officials on campus.
The university has also been poisoning baby rabbits and other animals, using a highly toxic anti-coagulant called bromadiolone. This compound, which is ten times stronger than warfarin, is being used around buildings and in wooded areas accessible to wildlife. This is a violation of federal and provincial laws and regulations, and a good example of UVic’s disregard for the ecology. The poison, which remains in the system for around 28 days, is passed on to predators (such as crows, hawks, owls, coyotes, fox, cats and dogs) who eat the effected prey species (such as baby rabbits, red squirrels, black squirrels, field mice and birds) who have died from the poison, or are weakened from internal bleeding and slow to escape the predators. Bromadiolone poisoning causes much pain and suffering, and the university should be held accountable for its widespread use of this dangerous compound.
Federal and provincial environment officials, and the BC Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (the body that enforces the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act) must enforce their respective laws, acts, and regulations in this clear-cut case of deliberate and dangerous misuse of a dangerous substance causing suffering and death to protected, red-listed, and endangered wildlife as well as non-target species that fall under the jurisdiction of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act.
The shooting, trapping, and poisoning of female rabbits has the additional consequence of the slow and agonizing deaths of their nursing babies, whose painful and lingering deaths occur deep in their burrows away from public scrutiny. Grounds crew have been told to fill in the burrows with earth. This will smother the inhabitants and prevent remaining babies from appearing above ground, their suffering visible to all.
Other municipalities have instituted non-lethal sterilization programs in combination with bylaws to prohibit the sale of fertile rabbits in pet stores. In Trap, Neuter, Release plans, the rabbits are adopted, relocated, or released following their surgery. In places where there are colonies of released sterilized animals, the population gradually reduces through attrition, and maintains an overall improved health profile. Now the standard in the civilized world, TNR has been dismissed and ignored by campus administration. This, despite the success of similar programs elsewhere, most recently at Long Beach College in California. There, an on-campus clinic and adoption site has been established, and vets and volunteers donate their time.
Calgary, Vernon, and Kelowna have instituted humane non-lethal rabbit control programs which have been well-received in their local communities. Kelowna, in fact, initially took a regressive approach, hiring a contractor to kill the abandoned pet rabbits in their community. For a period of two years, rabbits were cruelly exterminated in the city. Neighbours fought neighbours, debates became disturbances, protests grew and grew, property was vandalized, tourists noticed and took the story home with them, and the city became the butt of editorial cartoons far and wide. When a Youtube video of one of the exterminators stomping a rabbit to death went viral, Kelowna city council was forced to back down and stop the bloodbath.
Roxanne Woldenga, a humane rabbit control contractor from Kelowna commented in April: “Victoria is about to go through an ugly, heartbreaking chapter in its history for no better reasons than the ego and ignorance of those who have been placed in positions of responsibility for the lives and deaths of UVic’s…rabbits.” Wodenga advises a community-based approach is necessary for the rabbits to be saved, commenting “In the end, Kelowna adopted a humane solution of live capture, sex separation, foster programs for appropriate animals and sanctuaries for those remaining. Food, care and bedding are provided by a combination of public and private funds and volunteer labour. Of the original fifteen hundred feral rabbits condemned to die, more than one thousand were saved.”
A petition of over 1500 signatures was presented to the university in April and a number of others are currently doing the rounds. A plethora of media reports, face book pages and websites abound with information on this issue, and people from all sectors of society are expressing their concerns and getting involved. Internationally, a boycott of the University of Victoria is being organized, and other universities and animal welfare groups are contacting U Vic to express their opposition to their killing plan. On an individual basis, many alumni have expressed their horror and anger at their alma mater’s regressive stance. Current and prospective students have stated their decision to withdraw their registration, and elementary and high school students are getting involved in the issue as well. Tourism is being effected as the word spreads internationally, and UVic and the city of Victoria have become the butt of editorial cartoons and the subject of satire.
The rabbits are paying with their lives for the cruelty, ignorance, and morally bankrupt behaviour of those at the highest levels of the University of Victoria. President Dave Turpin (pres@uvic.ca), Chancellor Murray Farmer, Chair Board of Governors Ray Protti (both at usec3@uvic.ca), and Vice President Finance and Operations Gayle Gorrill (vpfo@uvic.ca). These are the individuals who are responsible for this horror. Ray Protti, prior to his installation at U Vic, was the Director of CSIS in Ottawa, and the CEO of the Canadian Bankers Association. As individuals, as administrators, their legacy will be one of violence and cruelty...their losses will be personal, professional, academic, and economic. The blood of these gentle animals is on their hands, and the reputation of the University of Victoria will be tarnished forever.
Barry Penner, a UVic alumnus is also BC’s Environment Minister (env.min@gov.bc.ca or barry.penner.mla@gov.bc.ca ) Sara Dubois is the BCSPCA’s Wildlife Services manager sdubois@spca.bc.ca and Marci Moriarty is the BCSPCA’s Head of Cruelty Investigations mmoriarty@spca.bc.ca and Craig Daniel is the CEO of the BCSPCA cdaniel@spca.bc.ca The federal Minister of the Environment is Jim Prentice Jim.Prentice@ec.gc.ca
A number of initiatives are underway to help the rabbits, and more information and the most current updates can be found on the Action for UVic Rabbits face book page. If you have trouble finding the page, go to Roslyn Cassells facebook and I will send you the link or email me (see below). The Rabbit Advocacy of BC website at www.rabbitadvocacy.com is also a good source of information. A rabbit email alert has been set up and anyone wanting to help the rabbits and stay informed on this issue can send a request to roslyncassells@yahoo.ca to be added to this list.
Roslyn Cassells is a BC based social justice activist and Canada's first elected Green. She is an ardent animal and human rights activist, and writes, teaches and campaigns for positive social, economic and ecological change everywhere.
Roslyn Cassells June 16, 2010, 4:18 p.m.
from Action for UVic Rabbits
Mass Shooting of UVic Rabbits Planned for June according to independent reports and Ministry documentsThe University of Victoria is planning a mass killing of the campus rabbits sometime this month, according to Tom Smith from Facilities Management. In an interview with Times Colonist writer Judith Lavoie reported in a May 15th article, Smith is quoted as sayingWe have said all along that we won’t do a major cull until the report comes out, but we’ve also said that if we need to do minor culls for safety and health reasons, we reserve the right to do that.” At the time of his interview with Lavoie, prior to the May 15 publication, Smith admitted that the university had already killed 94 rabbits. He also admitted the killing had begun in early May, when the university was making public denials of the cull. The article goes on to saySmith said the cull is not expected to move to other areas of campus until the management report is released in June.`If Smith considers 94 rabbits a
minor cull, how many rabbits will be killed in amajor cull? Given earlier statements to the media by Smith which placed anacceptable numberof resident rabbits post-cull at around 200-300, and given the variable estimates of the campus rabbit population, it would seem the university is planning amajor cullof around 1000 animals or more.Recently received documents reveal that the university and the Ministry of Environment have been discussing a
cullusingfirearmssince at least 2009. A letter sent from the Ministry to the university provides a response to a previous question posed by UVic inquiring about this deadly option.In an email from Karen Morrison of the provincial Environment Ministry to Richard Piskor, the head of Occupational Health and Safety and the Environment at UVic, Morrison refers to
the options discussed at our last meetingand goes on to respond to the options, one of which isA controlled cull...provincial permit may be required...if firearms are usedThe message is copied to Troy Forslund, Gerad Hales, and Micheal J Badry from the BC Environment Ministry, and was sent on November 20, 2009.In their July 24, 2008 report to Gayle Gorrill, VP Finance and Operations at UVic, LGL Ltd., Environmental Research Associates, in their report exerpted from the Feral Rabbit Inventory in Selected Areas of the University of Victoria Campus
recommended trapping, followed by shooting.Each approach has pros and cons. Trapping may be more appealing from the viewpoint of public perception. Conversely, trapping will be fairly labour intensive and the chances of it being a successful method are less certain than shooting. Trapping may, however, be a necessary precursor to a shooting program in order to improve the defensibility of shooting as an appropriate means of population control. Trapping would involve the live-capture of animals that would then be euthanized and properly disposed of off-campus. Standard Tomahawk/Havahart style traps could be placed under vegetative cover in the vicinity of rabbit concentrations. To improve capture rates, traps should be pre-baited for a few days with highly palatable foods (e.g., apple, grain). Traps should be set in the evening and checked the following morning. The ability of trapping to efficiently meet the objectives of population reduction should be assessed in a pilot area prior to initiating a trapping program over a broader area of the campus...Night-time shooting using a high-velocity .177 calibre air rifle with scope designed for low-light conditions, is an efficient way to cull rabbits. The use of a firearm on campus would require approval from, and up-to date communications with, security and law-enforcement authorities. Although operations would be conducted at night and air rifles are reasonably quiet, illumination (street, parking lot, security, athletic field) plus the fact that the project in in an urban environment would enhance the chances that one or more members of the general public would observe and report the shooter. Carcasses would be properly disposed of off-campus.`Other options mentioned in the MOE letter to UVic include the possibility of the rabbits being sterilized and re-released within 1 km of their capture site, and the option of sanctuaries taking the rabbits from UVic. The sterilization and release option was never tried by UVic, as they said were unwilling to bear the responsibility for the rabbits. In fact, in one of their earliest press releases about the rabbits the university stated they were unwilling to spend any money on a problem they considered to be a community issue and not their responsibility. However rescue groups have for years been trying to get the university's permission to remove abandoned pet rabbits from campus, something which falls outside of the Wildlife Act and does not require a MOE permit. As ministry officials confirm, abandoned pet rabbits do not fall under the Wildlife Act until they have been abandoned for a period of 30 days.
The sanctuary option was supposedly explored in the Feral Rabbit Pilot Project contracted out to Common Ground, a wildlife harm-reduction company, but the university has long put out the story that animal sanctuaries were unwilling to take in the UVic rabbits. However, in a recent article published in the UVic student newspaper the Martlet, on Thursday June 10, the project manager for the FRPP, Susan Vickery of Common Ground refuted this contention. Vickery said “I knew we were going to be able to see the other side of [the permitting issue]. UVic could have got allowances,” she said. “We ran into a minor obstacle with the ministry, but a major obstacle with the university administration, who didn’t see it through.” The university's contention that it has done its due diligence with regard to non-lethal options Vickery compared to teenagers telling you they have cleaned their room, when in fact they have just kicked their pile of reeking gym clothes under the bed. Vickery feels betrayed that the university didn’t see the pilot project through to the end. “I don’t think they’ve even begun to look at the non-lethal approaches to managing that population problem,” she said. “I don’t think they’ve seriously engaged the community and all that support. I don’t think they’ve come halfway at all.”
The fact is a number of sanctuaries were willing to take the animals, but the university halted the project one third of the way through, calling it a failure, despite clear evidence to the contrary. Negotiations were underway at the time the project was halted by UVic to provide MOE permits to interested groups and individuals and relax regulations which were not in the interest of the animals or the spirit of the Wildlife Act. In fact, Ministry officials have indicated their hope that non-lethal methods be employed if at all possible, and a sustainable management plan be developed in the interest of the animals and the community. The MOE is also considering changes to the Wildlife Act pertaining to domestic rabbits, in large part due to the controversy which has erupted at UVic.
In fact, at the time the Feral Rabbit Pilot Project was prematurely halted by UVic, a number of animals were already in the care of EARS Sanctuary on Saltspring Island, and will remain there for life. This fact is never acknowledged by UVic. Ten of the rabbits from the aborted Feral Rabbit Pilot Project were relocated to EARS. Most importantly, this registered animal welfare charity pursued the permitting process through the Ministry of the Environment and currently holds a 5-year permit for capturing, housing, sterilizing and providing life-long sanctuary care for UVic rabbits.
The misinformation being disseminated by the university about the animal rescue groups does a disservice to the attempts being made in the community to help these animals, and misrepresents the situation in a fundamental way. The deliberate and false statements put out by the university on this matter are clearly an attempt by the university to present itself in a good light, instead of the reality, which is very grim. The university's killing of these animals is not only unconscionable, it is also completely avoidable. Had the university accepted to work with community groups on this issue, most of the rabbits would have been removed and rehomed, and the remainder sterilized. The remaining infertile population would have eventually disappeared through attrition. The university would have got its wish to rid itself of rabbits, and it could all have been done in an ethical, economical, sustainable, non-lethal, and humane manner. Instead, the university maintains a stance of deliberate ignorance and persists in its nasty brutish plan to kill the rabbits.
Many in the community point to missed, dissed, or ignored non-lethal options from the community, the most recent being the offer from veterinarian Nick Shaw, who offered to vasectomize the entire male population of campus rabbits, and do a research project involving UVic students to boot. Shaw's generous offer comes at no cost to the university, and, it could be argued, would simultaneously improve UVic's disintegrating public image. But, as they say, you can lead a horse to water...
Having failed to locate the hearts or brains or moral centers of the UVic administrators, concerned citizens soon noticed a bigger bulge further down, in their pocketbooks, and decided to take aim there. An international boycott is being organized, financial supporters are beginning to withdraw, and UVic alumni are taking aim at their old alma mater on a number of levels.
Killing the rabbits will only, in the end, kill UVic.
Copyright Roslyn Cassells 2010. All or part of this article may be reprinted for any purpose at any time as long as correctly attributed. Please reprint, copy, share, and disseminate widely.
Prepared by Roslyn Cassells roslyncassells@yahoo.ca Action for UVic Rabbits
Susan Vickery, Common Ground Feral Rabbit Pilot Project Contractor email: susanvickery7@gmail.com
Dr. Nick Shaw - Shaw Pet Hospitals Veterinarian, proposing Vasectomy Project for UVic Rabbits tel: 250-652-4312 email: nshawdvm@shaw.ca
BC Rabbit Advocacy Group President Carmina Gooch tel: 604-924-3192 email: rabbitadbc@shaw.ca
Tom Smith tomfmgt@uvic.ca Facilities Management UVic 250-721-7591
Gayle Gorrill vpfo@uvic.ca VP Finance and Operations 250-721-7018
Dave Turpin President UVic dturpin@uvic.ca 250-721-7002
Reference documents below: Letter from BC Ministry of Environment to UVic in 2009 confirming planned shooting Excerpt from LGL 2008 report confirming shooting plan Times Colonist article May 15 2010 confirming major cull planned for June 2010 UVic student paper - Martlet article June 13 2010 and community members' comments
Letter from BC Ministry of Environment to UVic confirming planned shooting
From: Morrison, Karen ENV:EX Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 3:34 PM To: 'rpiskor@uvic.ca' Cc: Forslund, Troy ENV:EX; Hales, Gerad S ENV:EX; Badry, Micheal J ENV:EX Subject: UVic feral rabbits
FYI, the following is the information I have compiled to date following our meeting. I apologise for the delay in responding.
Schedule A of the Wildlife Act Designation and Exemption Regulation lists all species of the family Leporidae -hares and rabbits -as
wildlife. This means that any rabbit in BC iswildlifeand human interference with them is regulated under the Wildlife Act. Ownership in allwildlife` is vested in the government of BC and a person does not acquire a right of property in any wildlife except in accordance with a permit or licence.The ministry does not give out possession permits to keep wildlife as pets, except for the following uses:
· For use in zoos [for commercial use where such use does not adversely affect the public interest];
· To an individual with recognized qualifications or a scientific institution to conduct research in a region [only the Director may issue a permit where scientific research is to be conducted in more than one region];
· The keeping of wildlife under the provisions of the Game Farm Act or the Fur Farm Act are not covered by this policy.
A person can take a feral rabbit from the wild, and keep it without a possession permit, once taken they can also transport this feral rabbit without a permit. They cannot release this feral rabbit back to the wild without a permit [unless they are releasing the rabbit within 1 km of capture site and within 24 hours of capture], nor can they give this feral rabbit to another person, without that person requiring a possession permit to do so.
The following are the options discussed at our last meeting which I discussed with regional wildlife staff, and which comply with current ministry policy and provincial regulation:
Ø An agency or person takes the feral rabbits from the wild, keep the rabbits in their possession long enough to be sterilized, and then release these rabbits within 1 km of capture site on U Vic properties (this is in compliance of one of the provincial regulations which allows a person to capture and either euthanize or relocated within 1 km of capture site ).
Ø UVic proposal included holding sterilized feral rabbits in large wired defined enclosures or “sanctuaries” which are escape proof to live out their life. No permit is required if the agency or person owns the feral rabbit sanctuary into which the rabbits are placed. However, if the sanctuary is owned by someone other than the agency or individual who took the rabbits from the wild, that “someone” would need a possession permit.
Ø A controlled cull (which could take a number of forms) with a public education component. Provincial permit may be required related if firearms are used (discharge of firearms within a closed area); also need to addressing local area bylaws with regard to discharge of firearms would need to be addressed.
Please advise us of the direction you wish to proceed. Please feel free to contact us if you require further input/clarification of the above.
Regards Karen
Excerpt from LGL report confirming shooting plan:
Topic: Report from exterminators LGL, commissioned by the VP Finance and Operations, Gayle Gorrill Excerpt From: Feral Rabbit Inventory in Selected Areas of the University of Victoria Campus Submitted to: Office fo the Vice-President Finance and Operations, University of Victoria Submitted by: LGL Limited; Environmental Research Associates July 24, 2008
Times Colonist article confirming plan for
major cullin June 2010UVic capturing rabbits, giving them lethal injections Judith Lavoie, Victoria Times Colonist: Saturday, May 15, 2010 Rabbit overpopulation has been blamed for damage to the grounds at the University of Victoria
The University of Victoria has started killing rabbits around its sports fields, although a plan to manage the rapidly growing population will not be completed until next month.
Tom Smith, UVic’s facilities management director, said so far, 94 feral rabbits have been trapped live and taken to a local veterinarian for a lethal injection.
Trapping started last weekend, he said. “We have said all along that we won’t do a major cull until the report comes out, but we’ve also said that if we need to do minor culls for safety and health reasons, we reserve the right to do that.”
Smith said the rabbits have seen a recent population boom, and the population in the sports fields has grown to at least 200. Burrows are a danger to athletes, he said. “You walk along the grass and the ground collapses under your feet.”
Smith said the cull is not expected to move to other areas of campus until the management report is released in June.
Rabbit activist groups are planning a protest today at 1 p.m., with a march from Centennial Square to the legislature.
Although spaying and neutering will be part of the final plan, which is likely to recommend rabbit-control zones inside the ring road and bunny-free areas outside, there are too many rabbits to rely entirely on sterilization, Smith said.
An estimated 1,500 to 2,000 feral rabbits live on the university’s grounds, almost all descendants of abandoned pets.
An earlier pilot project designed to trap and sterilize rabbits was abandoned after 51 animals were trapped, partially because provincial regulations would not allow the animals to be adopted to private homes or to sanctuaries that had not been provincially approved.
Smith said the cull program is taking up where the pilot left off.
However, Susan Vickery of Common Ground, the company contracted for the pilot, called the cull a betrayal.
“This is abusing the goodwill of everyone in the community, who assumed there was not going to be a cull until the report was out,” she said.
Animal-rights activist Roslyn Cassells said the university has lied about its rabbit killings and an international boycott of the university is gaining steam.
“These are healthy, adoptable animals,” she said, calling the cull cruel. “There is no mention of the fate of the nursing baby bunnies of killed mother rabbits. They will be starving to death in their burrows or dying from dehydration.”
Veterinarian Nick Shaw, who has offered to vasectomize the rabbits free of charge, said he’s not sure if he is still willing to be involved. “This is not a situation we wanted to see unfold. There are likely to be some significant protests that the university might have to listen to.”
Sara Dubois, B.C. SPCA manager of wildlife services, said lethal injection is better than shooting.
“Our philosophy is that we don’t support a cull, but we don’t have the authority to stop it,” she said.
It would be impossible to find homes for 2,000 rabbits and the real villains are those who abandoned their pets, Dubois said.
This week, the B.C. SPCA sent letters to all Greater Victoria municipalities urging them to bring in bylaws to stop the sale of rabbits in pet stores.
Saanich South MLA Lana Popham is putting the finishing touches on a private member’s bill she hopes to introduce next week that would ban the sale of unsterilized rabbits in B.C.
Although private member’s bills almost never become law, Popham is optimistic, since some Liberals have said they will support her bill.
“It’s such a timely issue and it’s non-partisan.”
© Copyright (c) CW Media Inc.
UVic student paper - Martlet article June 13 2010 and community members' comments:
June 13th, 2010 | Just This Issue Rabbit cull miffs UVic community members Display_rabbit-trap_web Andrew Allen Traps such as the one above are being used in the university's cull of rabbits around athletic fields. Print
Jun 10, 2010 07:57 PM Kailey Willetts
Some campus community members feel the university hasn’t exhausted all the options for controlling UVic’s rabbit population, but their voices aren’t being heard.
The university began culling its rabbit population, which is estimated between 1,500 and 1,600 rabbits, on May 8. So far, more than 100 rabbits have been culled.
Susan Vickery of Common Ground, which led a pilot project to sterilize rabbits around the athletic field last year, said the university administration pulled the plug on the project before it was complete.
“We got a lot of [community] support,” she said. “I was actually in shock when they pulled it.”
Vickery said the pilot project was really a feasibility study. The plan was to trap, spay or neuter, and then rehouse rabbits, as well as track the population. The pilot project was expected to target approximately 150 rabbits, although the number was closer to 200 after the spring population increase.
“We were gathering a lot of info that we didn’t previously have.”
The pilot project was cut short, about 50 rabbits in, when an issue arose with the Ministry of Environment. The rabbits were to be taken to sanctuaries, but in order to do so, special permits were required.
“There was no place to take the rabbits,” said Tom Smith, UVic’s executive director of Facilities Management. “The sanctuaries that were hoping to take them were unwilling to go through the licensing process.”
He added that 40 of the spayed and neutered rabbits were returned to campus.
However, Vickery said Common Ground was still working with the sanctuaries and negotiating with the ministry when the pilot project was ended.
“I knew we were going to be able to see the other side of [the permitting issue]. UVic could have got allowances,” she said. “We ran into a minor obstacle with the ministry, but a major obstacle with the university administration, who didn’t want it to go through.”
Smith said the university began the cull because there are simply too many rabbits, and the university has a responsibility to control the population. Currently, they are focusing on the area around the athletic fields out of concern for the safety of athletes.
“Sometimes you see this tiny little hole, but the hole actually goes underground three or four feet and it goes parallel to the surface so when you walk along you step on the grass and it collapses under your feet,” said Smith. “So if you’re an athlete running and you do that, you could break your ankle or get seriously injured.”
Smith said the university also has a responsibility to keep the fields safe for members of the community who are using the fields on evenings and weekends. The university hopes to establish the athletic field area, as well as all other university property outside of Ring Road, as a rabbit-free zone. Inside Ring Road they plan to establish rabbit controlled zones.
However, many campus community members feel that culling the rabbit population outside of Ring Road isn’t the best option.
Vickery feels betrayed that the university didn’t see the pilot project through to the end.
“I don’t think they’ve even begun to look at the non-lethal approaches to managing that population problem,” she said. “I don’t think they’ve seriously engaged the community and all that support. I don’t think they’ve come halfway at all.”
Vickery isn’t alone. Facebook groups have sprung up opposing the cull, such as “Support Saving The UVic Bunnies,” which has 387 members, and “UVic Buns Management,” — a group dedicated to finding a non-lethal solution to rabbit overpopulation — which has 354 members. People opposed to the cull have also held marches and encouraged people to write to the university to try and get the attention of administrators.
Some rabbit activists have established chains of communication, and have come out to try and prevent rabbits from entering traps. One woman even offered to take a captured baby rabbit home with her.
The university is aware of the resistance to the cull.
“We respect that this is a sensitive issue for many people; many people care for the rabbits and we understand that,” said Smith. “This isn’t something that we want to do; this is something that we have to do.”
Smith said that while the university wants to be as respectful as possible of people’s opinions, it will be establishing its right to trap rabbits.
“These rabbits are considered wildlife under the Wildlife Act in B.C.,” he said. “The Wildlife Act states that its unlawful to interfere with legally set traps and there are fines that can be levied against people that interfere with legally set traps.”
Joey Fearon, a UVic Law student and representative of the UVic Vegan Association, says people need to take a step back and think about why the cull is happening.
“I think that generally speaking, when it comes to animals, most people are very confused, especially when it comes to how we should or shouldn’t treat animals.”
Fearon said that people often act in a contradictory fashion when it comes to animals — on one hand, treating them like family members and taking their welfare very seriously, and on the other, causing them extreme amounts of harm on a daily basis, such as through the meat industry or animal testing.
“I think from this framework where we claim to take animal interests seriously, but it’s very easy for us to be extremely violent to animals, I think that’s also at play in the situation with the UVic rabbits,” he said.
Fearon says that most people, when they see the rabbits, don’t want to harm them.
“[However], when they become an inconvenience, it becomes very easy to harm them,” he added. “If we claim to hold that we shouldn’t unnecessarily cause suffering and we shouldn’t unnecessarily kill animals, how does that play out with the UVic rabbits?”
Fearon said there are still many things the university could do, such as better fencing around the fields, to co-habit on campus with the rabbits.
“It doesn’t mean that the rabbits are never going to cause an inconvenience,” he said, “but that’s what it means to share the land with others. Humans cause us great inconvenience all the time.”
Roslyn Cassells June 16, 2010, 4:18 p.m.
from Action for UVic Rabbits
Mass Shooting of UVic Rabbits Planned for June according to independent reports and Ministry documentsThe University of Victoria is planning a mass killing of the campus rabbits sometime this month, according to Tom Smith from Facilities Management. In an interview with Times Colonist writer Judith Lavoie reported in a May 15th article, Smith is quoted as sayingWe have said all along that we won’t do a major cull until the report comes out, but we’ve also said that if we need to do minor culls for safety and health reasons, we reserve the right to do that.” At the time of his interview with Lavoie, prior to the May 15 publication, Smith admitted that the university had already killed 94 rabbits. He also admitted the killing had begun in early May, when the university was making public denials of the cull. The article goes on to saySmith said the cull is not expected to move to other areas of campus until the management report is released in June.`If Smith considers 94 rabbits a
minor cull, how many rabbits will be killed in amajor cull? Given earlier statements to the media by Smith which placed anacceptable numberof resident rabbits post-cull at around 200-300, and given the variable estimates of the campus rabbit population, it would seem the university is planning amajor cullof around 1000 animals or more.Recently received documents reveal that the university and the Ministry of Environment have been discussing a
cullusingfirearmssince at least 2009. A letter sent from the Ministry to the university provides a response to a previous question posed by UVic inquiring about this deadly option.In an email from Karen Morrison of the provincial Environment Ministry to Richard Piskor, the head of Occupational Health and Safety and the Environment at UVic, Morrison refers to
the options discussed at our last meetingand goes on to respond to the options, one of which isA controlled cull...provincial permit may be required...if firearms are usedThe message is copied to Troy Forslund, Gerad Hales, and Micheal J Badry from the BC Environment Ministry, and was sent on November 20, 2009.In their July 24, 2008 report to Gayle Gorrill, VP Finance and Operations at UVic, LGL Ltd., Environmental Research Associates, in their report exerpted from the Feral Rabbit Inventory in Selected Areas of the University of Victoria Campus
recommended trapping, followed by shooting.Each approach has pros and cons. Trapping may be more appealing from the viewpoint of public perception. Conversely, trapping will be fairly labour intensive and the chances of it being a successful method are less certain than shooting. Trapping may, however, be a necessary precursor to a shooting program in order to improve the defensibility of shooting as an appropriate means of population control. Trapping would involve the live-capture of animals that would then be euthanized and properly disposed of off-campus. Standard Tomahawk/Havahart style traps could be placed under vegetative cover in the vicinity of rabbit concentrations. To improve capture rates, traps should be pre-baited for a few days with highly palatable foods (e.g., apple, grain). Traps should be set in the evening and checked the following morning. The ability of trapping to efficiently meet the objectives of population reduction should be assessed in a pilot area prior to initiating a trapping program over a broader area of the campus...Night-time shooting using a high-velocity .177 calibre air rifle with scope designed for low-light conditions, is an efficient way to cull rabbits. The use of a firearm on campus would require approval from, and up-to date communications with, security and law-enforcement authorities. Although operations would be conducted at night and air rifles are reasonably quiet, illumination (street, parking lot, security, athletic field) plus the fact that the project in in an urban environment would enhance the chances that one or more members of the general public would observe and report the shooter. Carcasses would be properly disposed of off-campus.`Other options mentioned in the MOE letter to UVic include the possibility of the rabbits being sterilized and re-released within 1 km of their capture site, and the option of sanctuaries taking the rabbits from UVic. The sterilization and release option was never tried by UVic, as they said were unwilling to bear the responsibility for the rabbits. In fact, in one of their earliest press releases about the rabbits the university stated they were unwilling to spend any money on a problem they considered to be a community issue and not their responsibility. However rescue groups have for years been trying to get the university's permission to remove abandoned pet rabbits from campus, something which falls outside of the Wildlife Act and does not require a MOE permit. As ministry officials confirm, abandoned pet rabbits do not fall under the Wildlife Act until they have been abandoned for a period of 30 days.
The sanctuary option was supposedly explored in the Feral Rabbit Pilot Project contracted out to Common Ground, a wildlife harm-reduction company, but the university has long put out the story that animal sanctuaries were unwilling to take in the UVic rabbits. However, in a recent article published in the UVic student newspaper the Martlet, on Thursday June 10, the project manager for the FRPP, Susan Vickery of Common Ground refuted this contention. Vickery said “I knew we were going to be able to see the other side of [the permitting issue]. UVic could have got allowances,” she said. “We ran into a minor obstacle with the ministry, but a major obstacle with the university administration, who didn’t see it through.” The university's contention that it has done its due diligence with regard to non-lethal options Vickery compared to teenagers telling you they have cleaned their room, when in fact they have just kicked their pile of reeking gym clothes under the bed. Vickery feels betrayed that the university didn’t see the pilot project through to the end. “I don’t think they’ve even begun to look at the non-lethal approaches to managing that population problem,” she said. “I don’t think they’ve seriously engaged the community and all that support. I don’t think they’ve come halfway at all.”
The fact is a number of sanctuaries were willing to take the animals, but the university halted the project one third of the way through, calling it a failure, despite clear evidence to the contrary. Negotiations were underway at the time the project was halted by UVic to provide MOE permits to interested groups and individuals and relax regulations which were not in the interest of the animals or the spirit of the Wildlife Act. In fact, Ministry officials have indicated their hope that non-lethal methods be employed if at all possible, and a sustainable management plan be developed in the interest of the animals and the community. The MOE is also considering changes to the Wildlife Act pertaining to domestic rabbits, in large part due to the controversy which has erupted at UVic.
In fact, at the time the Feral Rabbit Pilot Project was prematurely halted by UVic, a number of animals were already in the care of EARS Sanctuary on Saltspring Island, and will remain there for life. This fact is never acknowledged by UVic. Ten of the rabbits from the aborted Feral Rabbit Pilot Project were relocated to EARS. Most importantly, this registered animal welfare charity pursued the permitting process through the Ministry of the Environment and currently holds a 5-year permit for capturing, housing, sterilizing and providing life-long sanctuary care for UVic rabbits.
The misinformation being disseminated by the university about the animal rescue groups does a disservice to the attempts being made in the community to help these animals, and misrepresents the situation in a fundamental way. The deliberate and false statements put out by the university on this matter are clearly an attempt by the university to present itself in a good light, instead of the reality, which is very grim. The university's killing of these animals is not only unconscionable, it is also completely avoidable. Had the university accepted to work with community groups on this issue, most of the rabbits would have been removed and rehomed, and the remainder sterilized. The remaining infertile population would have eventually disappeared through attrition. The university would have got its wish to rid itself of rabbits, and it could all have been done in an ethical, economical, sustainable, non-lethal, and humane manner. Instead, the university maintains a stance of deliberate ignorance and persists in its nasty brutish plan to kill the rabbits.
Many in the community point to missed, dissed, or ignored non-lethal options from the community, the most recent being the offer from veterinarian Nick Shaw, who offered to vasectomize the entire male population of campus rabbits, and do a research project involving UVic students to boot. Shaw's generous offer comes at no cost to the university, and, it could be argued, would simultaneously improve UVic's disintegrating public image. But, as they say, you can lead a horse to water...
Having failed to locate the hearts or brains or moral centers of the UVic administrators, concerned citizens soon noticed a bigger bulge further down, in their pocketbooks, and decided to take aim there. An international boycott is being organized, financial supporters are beginning to withdraw, and UVic alumni are taking aim at their old alma mater on a number of levels.
Killing the rabbits will only, in the end, kill UVic.
Copyright Roslyn Cassells 2010. All or part of this article may be reprinted for any purpose at any time as long as correctly attributed. Please reprint, copy, share, and disseminate widely.
Prepared by Roslyn Cassells roslyncassells@yahoo.ca Action for UVic Rabbits
Susan Vickery, Common Ground Feral Rabbit Pilot Project Contractor email: susanvickery7@gmail.com
Dr. Nick Shaw - Shaw Pet Hospitals Veterinarian, proposing Vasectomy Project for UVic Rabbits tel: 250-652-4312 email: nshawdvm@shaw.ca
BC Rabbit Advocacy Group President Carmina Gooch tel: 604-924-3192 email: rabbitadbc@shaw.ca
Tom Smith tomfmgt@uvic.ca Facilities Management UVic 250-721-7591
Gayle Gorrill vpfo@uvic.ca VP Finance and Operations 250-721-7018
Dave Turpin President UVic dturpin@uvic.ca 250-721-7002
Reference documents below: Letter from BC Ministry of Environment to UVic in 2009 confirming planned shooting Excerpt from LGL 2008 report confirming shooting plan Times Colonist article May 15 2010 confirming major cull planned for June 2010 UVic student paper - Martlet article June 13 2010 and community members' comments
Letter from BC Ministry of Environment to UVic confirming planned shooting
From: Morrison, Karen ENV:EX Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 3:34 PM To: 'rpiskor@uvic.ca' Cc: Forslund, Troy ENV:EX; Hales, Gerad S ENV:EX; Badry, Micheal J ENV:EX Subject: UVic feral rabbits
FYI, the following is the information I have compiled to date following our meeting. I apologise for the delay in responding.
Schedule A of the Wildlife Act Designation and Exemption Regulation lists all species of the family Leporidae -hares and rabbits -as
wildlife. This means that any rabbit in BC iswildlifeand human interference with them is regulated under the Wildlife Act. Ownership in allwildlife` is vested in the government of BC and a person does not acquire a right of property in any wildlife except in accordance with a permit or licence.The ministry does not give out possession permits to keep wildlife as pets, except for the following uses:
· For use in zoos [for commercial use where such use does not adversely affect the public interest];
· To an individual with recognized qualifications or a scientific institution to conduct research in a region [only the Director may issue a permit where scientific research is to be conducted in more than one region];
· The keeping of wildlife under the provisions of the Game Farm Act or the Fur Farm Act are not covered by this policy.
A person can take a feral rabbit from the wild, and keep it without a possession permit, once taken they can also transport this feral rabbit without a permit. They cannot release this feral rabbit back to the wild without a permit [unless they are releasing the rabbit within 1 km of capture site and within 24 hours of capture], nor can they give this feral rabbit to another person, without that person requiring a possession permit to do so.
The following are the options discussed at our last meeting which I discussed with regional wildlife staff, and which comply with current ministry policy and provincial regulation:
Ø An agency or person takes the feral rabbits from the wild, keep the rabbits in their possession long enough to be sterilized, and then release these rabbits within 1 km of capture site on U Vic properties (this is in compliance of one of the provincial regulations which allows a person to capture and either euthanize or relocated within 1 km of capture site ).
Ø UVic proposal included holding sterilized feral rabbits in large wired defined enclosures or “sanctuaries” which are escape proof to live out their life. No permit is required if the agency or person owns the feral rabbit sanctuary into which the rabbits are placed. However, if the sanctuary is owned by someone other than the agency or individual who took the rabbits from the wild, that “someone” would need a possession permit.
Ø A controlled cull (which could take a number of forms) with a public education component. Provincial permit may be required related if firearms are used (discharge of firearms within a closed area); also need to addressing local area bylaws with regard to discharge of firearms would need to be addressed.
Please advise us of the direction you wish to proceed. Please feel free to contact us if you require further input/clarification of the above.
Regards Karen
Excerpt from LGL report confirming shooting plan:
Topic: Report from exterminators LGL, commissioned by the VP Finance and Operations, Gayle Gorrill Excerpt From: Feral Rabbit Inventory in Selected Areas of the University of Victoria Campus Submitted to: Office fo the Vice-President Finance and Operations, University of Victoria Submitted by: LGL Limited; Environmental Research Associates July 24, 2008
Times Colonist article confirming plan for
major cullin June 2010UVic capturing rabbits, giving them lethal injections Judith Lavoie, Victoria Times Colonist: Saturday, May 15, 2010 Rabbit overpopulation has been blamed for damage to the grounds at the University of Victoria
The University of Victoria has started killing rabbits around its sports fields, although a plan to manage the rapidly growing population will not be completed until next month.
Tom Smith, UVic’s facilities management director, said so far, 94 feral rabbits have been trapped live and taken to a local veterinarian for a lethal injection.
Trapping started last weekend, he said. “We have said all along that we won’t do a major cull until the report comes out, but we’ve also said that if we need to do minor culls for safety and health reasons, we reserve the right to do that.”
Smith said the rabbits have seen a recent population boom, and the population in the sports fields has grown to at least 200. Burrows are a danger to athletes, he said. “You walk along the grass and the ground collapses under your feet.”
Smith said the cull is not expected to move to other areas of campus until the management report is released in June.
Rabbit activist groups are planning a protest today at 1 p.m., with a march from Centennial Square to the legislature.
Although spaying and neutering will be part of the final plan, which is likely to recommend rabbit-control zones inside the ring road and bunny-free areas outside, there are too many rabbits to rely entirely on sterilization, Smith said.
An estimated 1,500 to 2,000 feral rabbits live on the university’s grounds, almost all descendants of abandoned pets.
An earlier pilot project designed to trap and sterilize rabbits was abandoned after 51 animals were trapped, partially because provincial regulations would not allow the animals to be adopted to private homes or to sanctuaries that had not been provincially approved.
Smith said the cull program is taking up where the pilot left off.
However, Susan Vickery of Common Ground, the company contracted for the pilot, called the cull a betrayal.
“This is abusing the goodwill of everyone in the community, who assumed there was not going to be a cull until the report was out,” she said.
Animal-rights activist Roslyn Cassells said the university has lied about its rabbit killings and an international boycott of the university is gaining steam.
“These are healthy, adoptable animals,” she said, calling the cull cruel. “There is no mention of the fate of the nursing baby bunnies of killed mother rabbits. They will be starving to death in their burrows or dying from dehydration.”
Veterinarian Nick Shaw, who has offered to vasectomize the rabbits free of charge, said he’s not sure if he is still willing to be involved. “This is not a situation we wanted to see unfold. There are likely to be some significant protests that the university might have to listen to.”
Sara Dubois, B.C. SPCA manager of wildlife services, said lethal injection is better than shooting.
“Our philosophy is that we don’t support a cull, but we don’t have the authority to stop it,” she said.
It would be impossible to find homes for 2,000 rabbits and the real villains are those who abandoned their pets, Dubois said.
This week, the B.C. SPCA sent letters to all Greater Victoria municipalities urging them to bring in bylaws to stop the sale of rabbits in pet stores.
Saanich South MLA Lana Popham is putting the finishing touches on a private member’s bill she hopes to introduce next week that would ban the sale of unsterilized rabbits in B.C.
Although private member’s bills almost never become law, Popham is optimistic, since some Liberals have said they will support her bill.
“It’s such a timely issue and it’s non-partisan.”
© Copyright (c) CW Media Inc.
UVic student paper - Martlet article June 13 2010 and community members' comments:
June 13th, 2010 | Just This Issue Rabbit cull miffs UVic community members Display_rabbit-trap_web Andrew Allen Traps such as the one above are being used in the university's cull of rabbits around athletic fields. Print
Jun 10, 2010 07:57 PM Kailey Willetts
Some campus community members feel the university hasn’t exhausted all the options for controlling UVic’s rabbit population, but their voices aren’t being heard.
The university began culling its rabbit population, which is estimated between 1,500 and 1,600 rabbits, on May 8. So far, more than 100 rabbits have been culled.
Susan Vickery of Common Ground, which led a pilot project to sterilize rabbits around the athletic field last year, said the university administration pulled the plug on the project before it was complete.
“We got a lot of [community] support,” she said. “I was actually in shock when they pulled it.”
Vickery said the pilot project was really a feasibility study. The plan was to trap, spay or neuter, and then rehouse rabbits, as well as track the population. The pilot project was expected to target approximately 150 rabbits, although the number was closer to 200 after the spring population increase.
“We were gathering a lot of info that we didn’t previously have.”
The pilot project was cut short, about 50 rabbits in, when an issue arose with the Ministry of Environment. The rabbits were to be taken to sanctuaries, but in order to do so, special permits were required.
“There was no place to take the rabbits,” said Tom Smith, UVic’s executive director of Facilities Management. “The sanctuaries that were hoping to take them were unwilling to go through the licensing process.”
He added that 40 of the spayed and neutered rabbits were returned to campus.
However, Vickery said Common Ground was still working with the sanctuaries and negotiating with the ministry when the pilot project was ended.
“I knew we were going to be able to see the other side of [the permitting issue]. UVic could have got allowances,” she said. “We ran into a minor obstacle with the ministry, but a major obstacle with the university administration, who didn’t want it to go through.”
Smith said the university began the cull because there are simply too many rabbits, and the university has a responsibility to control the population. Currently, they are focusing on the area around the athletic fields out of concern for the safety of athletes.
“Sometimes you see this tiny little hole, but the hole actually goes underground three or four feet and it goes parallel to the surface so when you walk along you step on the grass and it collapses under your feet,” said Smith. “So if you’re an athlete running and you do that, you could break your ankle or get seriously injured.”
Smith said the university also has a responsibility to keep the fields safe for members of the community who are using the fields on evenings and weekends. The university hopes to establish the athletic field area, as well as all other university property outside of Ring Road, as a rabbit-free zone. Inside Ring Road they plan to establish rabbit controlled zones.
However, many campus community members feel that culling the rabbit population outside of Ring Road isn’t the best option.
Vickery feels betrayed that the university didn’t see the pilot project through to the end.
“I don’t think they’ve even begun to look at the non-lethal approaches to managing that population problem,” she said. “I don’t think they’ve seriously engaged the community and all that support. I don’t think they’ve come halfway at all.”
Vickery isn’t alone. Facebook groups have sprung up opposing the cull, such as “Support Saving The UVic Bunnies,” which has 387 members, and “UVic Buns Management,” — a group dedicated to finding a non-lethal solution to rabbit overpopulation — which has 354 members. People opposed to the cull have also held marches and encouraged people to write to the university to try and get the attention of administrators.
Some rabbit activists have established chains of communication, and have come out to try and prevent rabbits from entering traps. One woman even offered to take a captured baby rabbit home with her.
The university is aware of the resistance to the cull.
“We respect that this is a sensitive issue for many people; many people care for the rabbits and we understand that,” said Smith. “This isn’t something that we want to do; this is something that we have to do.”
Smith said that while the university wants to be as respectful as possible of people’s opinions, it will be establishing its right to trap rabbits.
“These rabbits are considered wildlife under the Wildlife Act in B.C.,” he said. “The Wildlife Act states that its unlawful to interfere with legally set traps and there are fines that can be levied against people that interfere with legally set traps.”
Joey Fearon, a UVic Law student and representative of the UVic Vegan Association, says people need to take a step back and think about why the cull is happening.
“I think that generally speaking, when it comes to animals, most people are very confused, especially when it comes to how we should or shouldn’t treat animals.”
Fearon said that people often act in a contradictory fashion when it comes to animals — on one hand, treating them like family members and taking their welfare very seriously, and on the other, causing them extreme amounts of harm on a daily basis, such as through the meat industry or animal testing.
“I think from this framework where we claim to take animal interests seriously, but it’s very easy for us to be extremely violent to animals, I think that’s also at play in the situation with the UVic rabbits,” he said.
Fearon says that most people, when they see the rabbits, don’t want to harm them.
“[However], when they become an inconvenience, it becomes very easy to harm them,” he added. “If we claim to hold that we shouldn’t unnecessarily cause suffering and we shouldn’t unnecessarily kill animals, how does that play out with the UVic rabbits?”
Fearon said there are still many things the university could do, such as better fencing around the fields, to co-habit on campus with the rabbits.
“It doesn’t mean that the rabbits are never going to cause an inconvenience,” he said, “but that’s what it means to share the land with others. Humans cause us great inconvenience all the time.”
Kathleen Terrio June 16, 2010, 8:17 p.m.
Debunking Mythsin a concise way1)
Rabbits are diseased and unhealthy- the pilot project proves this wrong - out of a sample of 51 - only one had to be euthanized.2)
Feral animals particularly rabbits are not adoptable for pivate homes- Long Beach City College proves this to be incorrect (I personally have 4 feral animals that are healthy, happy, friendly and well adjusted)3) Tom Smith
we have to do thisNo you don't HAVE to do this - you have been presented with so many alternatives and the university did not even allow the pilot project to be completed. Dr. Shaw and also Dr.Diane McClure form Western University in California both ofered to carry out a large-scale TNR programs - Dr. Shaw was turned down flat and Dr McClure was asked to participate in a 2011 program (which one has to assume meaning after the major cull has been completed). There is a community group who is working 24 hours a day finding solutions and yet they are ignored. Letters from individuals and professionals are only answered withform letters. Your are not listening to the community.Already, where I work international students are upset and appalled at what is going on. Our Marketing Manager says when checking sites on the internet -all the sites for Japanese students are only discussing the rabbit cull at the moment. The word is quickly spreading and it will continue to spread more unless UVic starts listening and comes up with a humane
non-lethal alternativeand accepts help from the community and professional who are willing to deal with this in a correct ethical cost effective way that will please everyone including the rabbits!Kathleen
Kathleen Terrio June 16, 2010, 8:17 p.m.
Debunking Mythsin a concise way1)
Rabbits are diseased and unhealthy- the pilot project proves this wrong - out of a sample of 51 - only one had to be euthanized.2)
Feral animals particularly rabbits are not adoptable for pivate homes- Long Beach City College proves this to be incorrect (I personally have 4 feral animals that are healthy, happy, friendly and well adjusted)3) Tom Smith
we have to do thisNo you don't HAVE to do this - you have been presented with so many alternatives and the university did not even allow the pilot project to be completed. Dr. Shaw and also Dr.Diane McClure form Western University in California both ofered to carry out a large-scale TNR programs - Dr. Shaw was turned down flat and Dr McClure was asked to participate in a 2011 program (which one has to assume meaning after the major cull has been completed). There is a community group who is working 24 hours a day finding solutions and yet they are ignored. Letters from individuals and professionals are only answered withform letters. Your are not listening to the community.Already, where I work international students are upset and appalled at what is going on. Our Marketing Manager says when checking sites on the internet -all the sites for Japanese students are only discussing the rabbit cull at the moment. The word is quickly spreading and it will continue to spread more unless UVic starts listening and comes up with a humane
non-lethal alternativeand accepts help from the community and professional who are willing to deal with this in a correct ethical cost effective way that will please everyone including the rabbits!Kathleen
Laura-Leah Shaw June 16, 2010, 9:05 p.m.
The attitude of the University of Victoria administrators saddens me, as they are shaping the minds of our future generation. they are teaching the leaders of tomorrow that it is fine to market and profit from a living being, and once the uselfullness is over - that killing them is also acceptable.
what happened to working together with interested groups, to find solutions that satisfy all parties?
there are so many options here - well said by many that have commented before me. Dr Shaw with his offer to vacectomize the rabbits at no cost to the university (he has been offering this for over a year - how many rabbits have been born since that offer was made?); spay/neuter and adopt out or set up sanctuaries to home the rabbits - a combination of this solution would satisfy all parties - and allow the rabbits to live out their natural lives. encourage the minister of the environment to relax the rules on the movement of the rabbits - perhaps the sanctuary won't be a five star hotel, but most anything is better than dying at the hands of the UVic trappers and killers. by the way, on June 1st i requested a meeting with both barry penner, enivornment minister and moira stillwell, advanced eduation minister - today i received a form email from penner's office saying his schedule would not allow for a meeting, and i have yet to hear from stilwell. thanks guys, you definately will get my vote next election! and it is a very good point that our tax dollars are going to pay for this kill (the word cull is an insult to the animals that die). perhaps we should begin withholding tax money - as consciencious objectors - i don't want the money i work so hard for going to pay for something i am so opposed to!
the university is looking pretty bad right now, but that can be changed. do the right thing, UVic administrators, adn work with us, not against us, to find a win win solution for removing the rabbits from your campus. thank you
Laura-Leah Shaw June 16, 2010, 9:05 p.m.
The attitude of the University of Victoria administrators saddens me, as they are shaping the minds of our future generation. they are teaching the leaders of tomorrow that it is fine to market and profit from a living being, and once the uselfullness is over - that killing them is also acceptable.
what happened to working together with interested groups, to find solutions that satisfy all parties?
there are so many options here - well said by many that have commented before me. Dr Shaw with his offer to vacectomize the rabbits at no cost to the university (he has been offering this for over a year - how many rabbits have been born since that offer was made?); spay/neuter and adopt out or set up sanctuaries to home the rabbits - a combination of this solution would satisfy all parties - and allow the rabbits to live out their natural lives. encourage the minister of the environment to relax the rules on the movement of the rabbits - perhaps the sanctuary won't be a five star hotel, but most anything is better than dying at the hands of the UVic trappers and killers. by the way, on June 1st i requested a meeting with both barry penner, enivornment minister and moira stillwell, advanced eduation minister - today i received a form email from penner's office saying his schedule would not allow for a meeting, and i have yet to hear from stilwell. thanks guys, you definately will get my vote next election! and it is a very good point that our tax dollars are going to pay for this kill (the word cull is an insult to the animals that die). perhaps we should begin withholding tax money - as consciencious objectors - i don't want the money i work so hard for going to pay for something i am so opposed to!
the university is looking pretty bad right now, but that can be changed. do the right thing, UVic administrators, adn work with us, not against us, to find a win win solution for removing the rabbits from your campus. thank you
Laura-Leah Shaw June 16, 2010, 9:05 p.m.
The attitude of the University of Victoria administrators saddens me, as they are shaping the minds of our future generation. they are teaching the leaders of tomorrow that it is fine to market and profit from a living being, and once the uselfullness is over - that killing them is also acceptable.
what happened to working together with interested groups, to find solutions that satisfy all parties?
there are so many options here - well said by many that have commented before me. Dr Shaw with his offer to vacectomize the rabbits at no cost to the university (he has been offering this for over a year - how many rabbits have been born since that offer was made?); spay/neuter and adopt out or set up sanctuaries to home the rabbits - a combination of this solution would satisfy all parties - and allow the rabbits to live out their natural lives. encourage the minister of the environment to relax the rules on the movement of the rabbits - perhaps the sanctuary won't be a five star hotel, but most anything is better than dying at the hands of the UVic trappers and killers. by the way, on June 1st i requested a meeting with both barry penner, enivornment minister and moira stillwell, advanced eduation minister - today i received a form email from penner's office saying his schedule would not allow for a meeting, and i have yet to hear from stilwell. thanks guys, you definately will get my vote next election! and it is a very good point that our tax dollars are going to pay for this kill (the word cull is an insult to the animals that die). perhaps we should begin withholding tax money - as consciencious objectors - i don't want the money i work so hard for going to pay for something i am so opposed to!
the university is looking pretty bad right now, but that can be changed. do the right thing, UVic administrators, adn work with us, not against us, to find a win win solution for removing the rabbits from your campus. thank you
Laura-Leah Shaw June 16, 2010, 9:05 p.m.
The attitude of the University of Victoria administrators saddens me, as they are shaping the minds of our future generation. they are teaching the leaders of tomorrow that it is fine to market and profit from a living being, and once the uselfullness is over - that killing them is also acceptable.
what happened to working together with interested groups, to find solutions that satisfy all parties?
there are so many options here - well said by many that have commented before me. Dr Shaw with his offer to vacectomize the rabbits at no cost to the university (he has been offering this for over a year - how many rabbits have been born since that offer was made?); spay/neuter and adopt out or set up sanctuaries to home the rabbits - a combination of this solution would satisfy all parties - and allow the rabbits to live out their natural lives. encourage the minister of the environment to relax the rules on the movement of the rabbits - perhaps the sanctuary won't be a five star hotel, but most anything is better than dying at the hands of the UVic trappers and killers. by the way, on June 1st i requested a meeting with both barry penner, enivornment minister and moira stillwell, advanced eduation minister - today i received a form email from penner's office saying his schedule would not allow for a meeting, and i have yet to hear from stilwell. thanks guys, you definately will get my vote next election! and it is a very good point that our tax dollars are going to pay for this kill (the word cull is an insult to the animals that die). perhaps we should begin withholding tax money - as consciencious objectors - i don't want the money i work so hard for going to pay for something i am so opposed to!
the university is looking pretty bad right now, but that can be changed. do the right thing, UVic administrators, adn work with us, not against us, to find a win win solution for removing the rabbits from your campus. thank you
MIchele Crover June 17, 2010, 4:33 a.m.
Isn't a university a place of
higher learningand the institution where new attitudes and beliefs are fostered? Why doesn't U-Vic begin by setting an example of compassion and intelligent, humane solutions regarding the feral rabbits on its campus?MIchele Crover June 17, 2010, 4:33 a.m.
Isn't a university a place of
higher learningand the institution where new attitudes and beliefs are fostered? Why doesn't U-Vic begin by setting an example of compassion and intelligent, humane solutions regarding the feral rabbits on its campus?Nancy June 17, 2010, 4:51 p.m.
Just think of the negative publicity you are getting at U.Vic. A change in policy regarding the rabbit cull would pay off big in the eyes of the public. You still have a chance.
Nancy June 17, 2010, 4:51 p.m.
Just think of the negative publicity you are getting at U.Vic. A change in policy regarding the rabbit cull would pay off big in the eyes of the public. You still have a chance.
Nancy June 17, 2010, 4:52 p.m.
Just think of the negative publicity you are getting at U.Vic. A change in policy regarding the rabbit cull would pay off big in the eyes of the public. You still have a chance.
Nancy June 17, 2010, 4:52 p.m.
Just think of the negative publicity you are getting at U.Vic. A change in policy regarding the rabbit cull would pay off big in the eyes of the public. You still have a chance.
Anonymous June 17, 2010, 6:18 p.m.
People are dying all over the world and you people choose to focus on ferral rabbits??? Seriously, get a life.
Its the university's property, and it's their right to do what they want. As a UVic student I fully support their decision. And since many of you don't go here, I'd stuggest you really stop worrying about it.
Anonymous June 17, 2010, 6:18 p.m.
People are dying all over the world and you people choose to focus on ferral rabbits??? Seriously, get a life.
Its the university's property, and it's their right to do what they want. As a UVic student I fully support their decision. And since many of you don't go here, I'd stuggest you really stop worrying about it.
Robert Shaw June 17, 2010, 6:49 p.m.
Anonymous why are you afraid to give your name? And you are a student at UVic but cannot spell 'suggest'? Even with Spell-Check?
Robert Shaw June 17, 2010, 6:49 p.m.
Anonymous why are you afraid to give your name? And you are a student at UVic but cannot spell 'suggest'? Even with Spell-Check?
Anne Terrio June 18, 2010, 1:44 a.m.
Who says the rabbits are the University's property? They are living creatures that actually belong to all of us. (not property!) The university is the guardian of the property and the students and the taxpayers are the actual owners paying for this institution so everyone has a right to saywhat happens to the rabbits.
Anne Terrio June 18, 2010, 1:44 a.m.
Who says the rabbits are the University's property? They are living creatures that actually belong to all of us. (not property!) The university is the guardian of the property and the students and the taxpayers are the actual owners paying for this institution so everyone has a right to saywhat happens to the rabbits.
Bill June 18, 2010, 12:04 p.m.
From The Charlatan - Carleton's Independant Newspaper
Although things have gone well so far, PISKOR said bringing UVic’s rabbit population down to acceptable levels will be expensive.
“We have to try to look at community resources, community support and in-kind contributions . . . [earthanimalrights.org] are accepting donations, looking at volunteer opportunities and working with the veterinary community to see what kind of assistance can be determined.”
How quickly things change!
Bill June 18, 2010, 12:04 p.m.
From The Charlatan - Carleton's Independant Newspaper
Although things have gone well so far, PISKOR said bringing UVic’s rabbit population down to acceptable levels will be expensive.
“We have to try to look at community resources, community support and in-kind contributions . . . [earthanimalrights.org] are accepting donations, looking at volunteer opportunities and working with the veterinary community to see what kind of assistance can be determined.”
How quickly things change!
Tasha June 18, 2010, 11:55 p.m.
Wild rabbits don't live longer than 3-5 years anyways, and most of them have been on campus for a while. Why not spay/neuter them, and within a year/year and a half, the population will drop significantly on its own. No culls needed....anyone thought of that?
And what difference will a year make to anyone?
Tasha June 18, 2010, 11:55 p.m.
Wild rabbits don't live longer than 3-5 years anyways, and most of them have been on campus for a while. Why not spay/neuter them, and within a year/year and a half, the population will drop significantly on its own. No culls needed....anyone thought of that?
And what difference will a year make to anyone?
Lothar June 20, 2010, 11:11 p.m.
Athletes breaking ankles on grass, very lame. They should be on specified track or in the gym. Getting rid of attack rabbits, good idea , if such a thing existed maybe. Why don't we get rid of all the squirrels in Stanley park because they could cause kids disease. Why not just get rid of all predatory animals in the wild. How about all the coyotes and raccoons in the Lower Mainland . You get the picture, we could continue, why not just get together with the opposition and come to an agreement and stick to it. Lothar
Lothar June 20, 2010, 11:11 p.m.
Athletes breaking ankles on grass, very lame. They should be on specified track or in the gym. Getting rid of attack rabbits, good idea , if such a thing existed maybe. Why don't we get rid of all the squirrels in Stanley park because they could cause kids disease. Why not just get rid of all predatory animals in the wild. How about all the coyotes and raccoons in the Lower Mainland . You get the picture, we could continue, why not just get together with the opposition and come to an agreement and stick to it. Lothar
James June 22, 2010, 12:50 p.m.
Roslyn, they didn't include your facebook group, because your group is full of shit.
You claim UVic set up snares, hit bunnies on the head with shovels, and twice claimed that UVic killed over 1000 rabbits overnight. Nobody believes you and you are making it hard for everyone to take anything seriously.
You were kicked out of the groups listed because you are a big, fat liar.
James June 22, 2010, 12:50 p.m.
Roslyn, they didn't include your facebook group, because your group is full of shit.
You claim UVic set up snares, hit bunnies on the head with shovels, and twice claimed that UVic killed over 1000 rabbits overnight. Nobody believes you and you are making it hard for everyone to take anything seriously.
You were kicked out of the groups listed because you are a big, fat liar.
Cassandra T June 27, 2010, 12:21 p.m.
Oh, David Foster you are so right, those awful vicious rabbits...my god...are you alright..did they soil those cheap suits of yours? Seriously, vicious rabbits? They are gentle, peaceful animals with an intelligence that far exceeds yours little boy..or whatever you are...
Cassandra T June 27, 2010, 12:21 p.m.
Oh, David Foster you are so right, those awful vicious rabbits...my god...are you alright..did they soil those cheap suits of yours? Seriously, vicious rabbits? They are gentle, peaceful animals with an intelligence that far exceeds yours little boy..or whatever you are...
James June 30, 2010, 1:05 p.m.
Arts students = Unemployable, hopelessly naïve and ignorant, useless people. Science students currently need English credits to graduate and I think it’s time to implement the reverse. Maybe with a bit of practical knowledge, these bleeding hearts will wake up.
James June 30, 2010, 1:05 p.m.
Arts students = Unemployable, hopelessly naïve and ignorant, useless people. Science students currently need English credits to graduate and I think it’s time to implement the reverse. Maybe with a bit of practical knowledge, these bleeding hearts will wake up.