donate

The Martlet

Salmon farmers fight back

Oct 22, 2009 | Volume 62 Issue 11 | 6 Comments
Share |

Pressure on any industry to perform well is ultimately a good thing. As any of the thousands of workers in B.C.’s aquaculture sector will proudly tell you, our industry has come a long way in a short time. They’ll also tell you our sustainability practices are second-to-none.

I’d like to point out that pressures on wild salmon in B.C. — and along the entire coast of North America — include development, logging, mining, changing ocean temperatures, food supply and fishing. 

The theory that sea lice from salmon farms will wipe out wild Pink salmon has been proven false, as wild Pink numbers this year in areas of salmon farms are above average.

Now, activists say high Pink numbers are because salmon farmers are fallowing [temporarily removing salmon from the sea pens] during outmigration periods, but salmon farmers have continued the same management practices as in the past. 

The highest return of wild Pink salmon in recorded history occurred in 2000 — more than a decade after the start of salmon farming in B.C.

Regarding sea lice, it’s important to note they are natural parasites of both farmed and wild salmon. SLICE, a therapeutant used to treat sea lice on farmed salmon, has been formally approved by Health Canada and poses no known health risk for humans. SLICE has very little toxic effect on the marine environment. 

The possibility of disease outbreaks on farmed salmon in B.C. is low, as Canadian-farmed salmon stocks are healthy. Stringent controls are in place to ensure there are no cases of infectious salmon anaemia (ISA) virus on the West Coast. On the East Coast, where ISA is an endemic disease — that is, part of the marine ecosystem — there have been no ISA outbreaks for nearly three years. ISA vaccines have been developed by Canadian health experts, and all Canadian farmed salmon stocks are monitored regularly for the disease. Early detection is key to avoiding outbreaks.

I’d also like to comment that with constant improvements in feed, Canadian salmon farmers only require an average of 1.5 kilograms of feed to grow one kilogram of salmon.

The amount of wild fish meal and oil used in feed is being reduced, and substituted by plant-based proteins, with no significant reduction in heart-healthy omega-3 fatty acids in the salmon.

Canadian salmon farmers are leading the way in feed technologies. Most use approximately 30 per cent fish meal and oil in each kilogram of feed — that means only 0.3 kilograms of wild fish are needed to grow one kilogram of farmed salmon.

Looking at the big picture, growing fish is more efficient than raising animals on land.

The allegation that sea lice from B.C. salmon farms are killing Fraser River sockeye is far-fetched. Researchers now understand that Pacific salmon are resistant to damage from sea lice except in their infancy, when first leaving their natal rivers.

In the case of Fraser River Sockeye, the closest salmon farm is over 110 kilometers away from the Fraser River’s mouth, so there is little opportunity for Fraser River salmon fry to come in contact with farmed salmon during critical early life stages.

Paul Sprout, the Pacific region director general of Fisheries and Oceans Canada, has clearly stated: “Sea lice from fish farms are not the explanation for this year’s extremely poor marine survival of Fraser River sockeye.”

In terms of government jurisdiction of salmon farms in B.C., salmon farmers will continue to abide transparently by a strict set of regulations — whether the industry is managed provincially or federally.

The United Nations says the number of hungry people in the world has surpassed one billion for the first time in 40 years. Let’s focus on the real problem: providing safe, healthy, affordable food to a growing global population.

Ruth Salmon is the Canadian Aquaculture Industry Alliance Executive Director

Share |

6 Comments

The Martlet has an open comments policy and will endeavour to promote healthy discussion. We strive to act as an agent of constructive social change and will remove racist, sexist, homophobic, or otherwise oppressive comments.

Leave a Comment

  • Alexandra Morton Oct. 22, 2009, 4:04 p.m.

    Ruth Salmon is confusing the issue:

    Farm lice will wipe out pink salmon if left untreated. But the work many of us have done inspired the fish farmers to delouse their fish every spring and this reduced sea lice on the pinks. She knows this but does not mention it why?

    Yes, lice are natural, but salmon feedlots are not and they are enhancing sea lice to unnatural levels.

    Yes, wild salmon did survive fish farms until the fish farms grew so big and numerous that they tipped the pathogen balance out of control. Fish farms grew from 127,000 to over 1 million in some sites (Okisollo 2007 Marine Harvest website).

    There are many wild fish in fish farms (Morton vs Marine Harvest Port Hardy Court) it would be interesting to see how their conversion rate would look without these wild fish.

    No one knows the impact of Slice on the marine environment, it is under investigation right now.

    I was one of the last people to examine this run of sockeye in 2007 as they were being infested by sea lice near fish farms off Campbell River. It is unknown how many sea lice a sockeye smolt can bear, but the bigger question is what farm bacteria and viruses were these sockeye exposed to?

    Salmon are carnivores, farming carnivores can only decrease world food supply. Farming other species of fish in tanks might be a much more successful endeavor.

    http://alexandramorton.typepad.com/

  • Alexandra Morton Oct. 22, 2009, 4:04 p.m.

    Ruth Salmon is confusing the issue:

    Farm lice will wipe out pink salmon if left untreated. But the work many of us have done inspired the fish farmers to delouse their fish every spring and this reduced sea lice on the pinks. She knows this but does not mention it why?

    Yes, lice are natural, but salmon feedlots are not and they are enhancing sea lice to unnatural levels.

    Yes, wild salmon did survive fish farms until the fish farms grew so big and numerous that they tipped the pathogen balance out of control. Fish farms grew from 127,000 to over 1 million in some sites (Okisollo 2007 Marine Harvest website).

    There are many wild fish in fish farms (Morton vs Marine Harvest Port Hardy Court) it would be interesting to see how their conversion rate would look without these wild fish.

    No one knows the impact of Slice on the marine environment, it is under investigation right now.

    I was one of the last people to examine this run of sockeye in 2007 as they were being infested by sea lice near fish farms off Campbell River. It is unknown how many sea lice a sockeye smolt can bear, but the bigger question is what farm bacteria and viruses were these sockeye exposed to?

    Salmon are carnivores, farming carnivores can only decrease world food supply. Farming other species of fish in tanks might be a much more successful endeavor.

    http://alexandramorton.typepad.com/

  • john roelofs Oct. 26, 2009, 7:03 p.m.

    How many kg (wet weight) of wild fish does it take to produce 1 kg (dry weight) of fish oil used to make aquaculture feed? I doubt it is one to one as Ms Salmon assumes. Recent studies (everywhere online) say it takes about 5 kg of wild fish to produce one kg of farmed atlantic salmon.

  • john roelofs Oct. 26, 2009, 7:03 p.m.

    How many kg (wet weight) of wild fish does it take to produce 1 kg (dry weight) of fish oil used to make aquaculture feed? I doubt it is one to one as Ms Salmon assumes. Recent studies (everywhere online) say it takes about 5 kg of wild fish to produce one kg of farmed atlantic salmon.

  • Dylan Hardie Oct. 28, 2009, 4:45 a.m.

    This article angered me. To the point where I wish I had read it earlier so I could have written a rebuttal for the paper which is going to print as I type. Simply put, there are so many blatantly false points and misleading statements that I am surprised the author is even willing to take public credit for it.

    Sea lice wiping out pink salmon proven false? Bullshit. How? There have been many studies showing this to be the case. Furthermore, these runs survived only when the lice-bearing farmed salmon were not present. Hmm... coincidence? Science would say NO.

    Slice? WTF? Introducing a product designed to kill a form of life into a fragile ecosystem is NOT a sustainable practice nor can it be said to have little toxic effect on the marine environment. There are so many factors that cannot be controlled or reproduced in a laboratory environment.

    To raise any animal, it must consume more than it's final mass during the process of growth. Feeding fish to fish to make fish isn't a sustainable equation. In fact, it results in a NET LOSS OF FISH. If this Ruth Salmon really believes, as she leads us to suspect, that BC farmed salmon can feed the millions of starving people in Africa, then why would we be throwing away fish protein in this conversion? Seriously? I mean, that farmed BC salmon would be shipped to Africa is preposterous, but the equation between the two is lacking in some fundamental logic.

    ...not to mention that many countries are exploiting fish off the coast of Africa, depriving Africans in coastal communities of their traditional food sources, and that some of these fish are used in the production of fish pellets - THE SAME PELLETS USED TO GROW FARMED SALMON... Maybe it isn't related, but this does follow Ms. Salmon's method of argumentation...

    Oh, that salmon are more efficient to grow than animals on land. Um... what does that have to do with the topic? Just because strip mining or clear cutting is more efficient doesn't mean it is a sustainable method of harvest.

    Lastly, if fish farms have been exonerated for blame in the collapse of the Fraser River Sockeye run, then why is there a call for an independent judicial inquiry into this salmon crisis? (can be found at: http://peterjulian.ndp.ca/node/864)

    Salmon can be farmed in a manner which does not affect wild stocks. All it requires is a closed containment system, which is currently being used successfully in other parts of the world. Why must we settle for the devastation of our wild stocks so that private companies can make money reproducing in nets what nature makes in abundance if given a fair chance? Open-net fish farms pollute the ecosystem in which they inhabit.

  • Dylan Hardie Oct. 28, 2009, 4:45 a.m.

    This article angered me. To the point where I wish I had read it earlier so I could have written a rebuttal for the paper which is going to print as I type. Simply put, there are so many blatantly false points and misleading statements that I am surprised the author is even willing to take public credit for it.

    Sea lice wiping out pink salmon proven false? Bullshit. How? There have been many studies showing this to be the case. Furthermore, these runs survived only when the lice-bearing farmed salmon were not present. Hmm... coincidence? Science would say NO.

    Slice? WTF? Introducing a product designed to kill a form of life into a fragile ecosystem is NOT a sustainable practice nor can it be said to have little toxic effect on the marine environment. There are so many factors that cannot be controlled or reproduced in a laboratory environment.

    To raise any animal, it must consume more than it's final mass during the process of growth. Feeding fish to fish to make fish isn't a sustainable equation. In fact, it results in a NET LOSS OF FISH. If this Ruth Salmon really believes, as she leads us to suspect, that BC farmed salmon can feed the millions of starving people in Africa, then why would we be throwing away fish protein in this conversion? Seriously? I mean, that farmed BC salmon would be shipped to Africa is preposterous, but the equation between the two is lacking in some fundamental logic.

    ...not to mention that many countries are exploiting fish off the coast of Africa, depriving Africans in coastal communities of their traditional food sources, and that some of these fish are used in the production of fish pellets - THE SAME PELLETS USED TO GROW FARMED SALMON... Maybe it isn't related, but this does follow Ms. Salmon's method of argumentation...

    Oh, that salmon are more efficient to grow than animals on land. Um... what does that have to do with the topic? Just because strip mining or clear cutting is more efficient doesn't mean it is a sustainable method of harvest.

    Lastly, if fish farms have been exonerated for blame in the collapse of the Fraser River Sockeye run, then why is there a call for an independent judicial inquiry into this salmon crisis? (can be found at: http://peterjulian.ndp.ca/node/864)

    Salmon can be farmed in a manner which does not affect wild stocks. All it requires is a closed containment system, which is currently being used successfully in other parts of the world. Why must we settle for the devastation of our wild stocks so that private companies can make money reproducing in nets what nature makes in abundance if given a fair chance? Open-net fish farms pollute the ecosystem in which they inhabit.

 

Martlet Video

Fight the Pipe

The Martlet on Twitter

  • Feb. 8, 2012, 9:54 p.m. Our sex themed issue comes out tomorrow. You guys should be excited.
Join our mailing list