UVic celebrates 10 years of U-Pass
Live music blared over the sound of tires and engines by the bus loop on Sept. 30 as the Boston Molasses Disaster helped celebrate the 10th anniversary of UVic’s Universal Bus Pass, the U-Pass.
The celebration, put on by the UVic Students’ Society (UVSS), also included free cake and speeches from several speakers.
The speakers, who included Victoria-Hillside MLA Rob Fleming, UVic’s Sustainability Co-ordinator Sarah Webb and UVSS Chairperson Veronica Harrison, extolled the merits of the U-Pass and the vision of the three major players (B.C. Transit, Camosun College Student Society (CCSS) and the UVSS) in implementing the U-Pass before any other university in Western Canada had such a program.
B.C. Transit’s Chief Executive Officer Manuel Achadinha spoke to the crowd about how the U-Pass was conceived in 1998, when he was in charge of BC Transit’s marketing. He recalled that it was a student movement that brought it about — when the idea of having a pass was brought to referendum, voter turnout was over 80 per cent and over 65 per cent voted in favor.
Chris Foord, co-chair of the Capital Region District’s (CRD) Traffic Safety Commission, praised the effects of the U-Pass on traffic flow in the capital, saying that it significantly reduced the number of cars on the road.
Fleming, who was the chair of the UVSS when the U-Pass was first introduced, also praised the reduction of car trips to the university, saying that it was the largest green initiative the university has taken.
Gayle Gorill, UVic’s Vice President of Finance, added that the reduced number of car trips meant that the university could construct buildings on parking lots and still have enough parking on campus.
“Affordable transit” was frequently mentioned during the speeches. At $69.25 per term, the U-Pass is cheaper than any other bus pass out there — a one month pass would otherwise cost $73.25.
Achadinha said that part of the idea of providing a U-Pass was getting students used to using public transit so that after graduation they would continue to use transit. He said that students continuing to use transit after they graduate keeps cars of the road and greenhouse gases out of the atmosphere.
Harrison was also concerned with fair and affordable transit. She noted that there are colleges in Vancouver, such as Vancouver Community College, who are not part of the UBC and SFU U-Pass program, and their students pay significantly more for bus services.

10 Comments
The Martlet has an open comments policy and will endeavour to promote healthy discussion. We strive to act as an agent of constructive social change and will remove racist, sexist, homophobic, or otherwise oppressive comments.
Leave a Comment
Jon Harper Oct. 8, 2009, 10:51 a.m.
Did you know that Rob Fleming impersonated a UVSS Chief Electoral Officer in order to have all his opponents' campaign materials ripped down? That's how he became Chair of the UVSS!
Jon Harper Oct. 8, 2009, 10:51 a.m.
Did you know that Rob Fleming impersonated a UVSS Chief Electoral Officer in order to have all his opponents' campaign materials ripped down? That's how he became Chair of the UVSS!
Adam Oct. 8, 2009, 10:53 a.m.
What a load of crap!!! And a waste of money and time!!! And don't dirty the name of the great city of Boston with your crappy band!
Adam Oct. 8, 2009, 10:53 a.m.
What a load of crap!!! And a waste of money and time!!! And don't dirty the name of the great city of Boston with your crappy band!
B Oct. 8, 2009, 1:54 p.m.
I think it's ironic how they
celebratethe removal of student liberties (by forcing them to participate in a program that many of them did want to be a part of). It sounds an awful lot like social engineering to me --we want to train people to use the bus. What business does the UVSS have telling the students what's anacceptablemode of transport and what isn't?B Oct. 8, 2009, 1:54 p.m.
I think it's ironic how they
celebratethe removal of student liberties (by forcing them to participate in a program that many of them did want to be a part of). It sounds an awful lot like social engineering to me --we want to train people to use the bus. What business does the UVSS have telling the students what's anacceptablemode of transport and what isn't?Mike Oct. 21, 2009, 5:17 a.m.
In response to B: it's pragmatic not ironic. The UVSS is the umbrella network for the student body for whom ethical student decisions should be, by nature of its democracy, implemented by and for the students.
If there were not
GUIDESfor where smokers must smoke we would all be inhaling cancer-causing agents in the classroom, which from your definition is a form of social engineering, albeit an ethically astute one. The U-Pass is an analogousGUIDEfor the safety of the student populace now and in the future by virtue of its social construction to conform students into environmentally friendly practices. Of course the bus fleet must eventually become completely electric... nevertheless my point stands.Further, it's very curious that as a society we allow for and unrequitedly accept the consequences of fossil fuel emissions, which by allocating a required bus pass, stifles Uvic's carbon footprint (perhaps by small margins - but a margin indeed).
The real irony is that smoking / fossil-fuel emitting single occupancy vehicles are still permitted on campus.
Let's discuss a Smoke-free / Car-free campus. It's possible but may require some form of quasi-social engineering. ;)
Oh and to throw my two cents in, we should stop investing in lucrative industries... tisk tisk Uvic.
Mike Oct. 21, 2009, 5:17 a.m.
In response to B: it's pragmatic not ironic. The UVSS is the umbrella network for the student body for whom ethical student decisions should be, by nature of its democracy, implemented by and for the students.
If there were not
GUIDESfor where smokers must smoke we would all be inhaling cancer-causing agents in the classroom, which from your definition is a form of social engineering, albeit an ethically astute one. The U-Pass is an analogousGUIDEfor the safety of the student populace now and in the future by virtue of its social construction to conform students into environmentally friendly practices. Of course the bus fleet must eventually become completely electric... nevertheless my point stands.Further, it's very curious that as a society we allow for and unrequitedly accept the consequences of fossil fuel emissions, which by allocating a required bus pass, stifles Uvic's carbon footprint (perhaps by small margins - but a margin indeed).
The real irony is that smoking / fossil-fuel emitting single occupancy vehicles are still permitted on campus.
Let's discuss a Smoke-free / Car-free campus. It's possible but may require some form of quasi-social engineering. ;)
Oh and to throw my two cents in, we should stop investing in lucrative industries... tisk tisk Uvic.
B Oct. 26, 2009, 5:12 p.m.
Mike's response would make sense were it not for the fact he leaps to the illogical conclusion that - if students aren't forced to take the bus - that they will necessarily rely on some mode of transportation more harmful to the environment. There's a great many people that bike to UVic. What's their reward for being ecologically conscious? Being forced to participate in a program that they don't want nor use. Maybe they should just give up on riding their bikes and take the bus, seeing as they have the UPass anyhow.
What's the logical result of forcing all UVic students to buy into this program? A great many more students taking the bus than normally would. What's the logical result of that? Year after year after YEAR of news reports of overcrowded busses flying past bus stops full of people because they can't accomodate any more passengers. But of course Mike's fine with that.
And by the way, banning smoking on campus does not conform to my definition of social engineering any more than requiring hard hats on a construction site would. When one makes statements like
we want students to get used to using public transit so that after graduation they will continue to do so, that's social engineering.B Oct. 26, 2009, 5:12 p.m.
Mike's response would make sense were it not for the fact he leaps to the illogical conclusion that - if students aren't forced to take the bus - that they will necessarily rely on some mode of transportation more harmful to the environment. There's a great many people that bike to UVic. What's their reward for being ecologically conscious? Being forced to participate in a program that they don't want nor use. Maybe they should just give up on riding their bikes and take the bus, seeing as they have the UPass anyhow.
What's the logical result of forcing all UVic students to buy into this program? A great many more students taking the bus than normally would. What's the logical result of that? Year after year after YEAR of news reports of overcrowded busses flying past bus stops full of people because they can't accomodate any more passengers. But of course Mike's fine with that.
And by the way, banning smoking on campus does not conform to my definition of social engineering any more than requiring hard hats on a construction site would. When one makes statements like
we want students to get used to using public transit so that after graduation they will continue to do so, that's social engineering.